I have been reading this forum for several weeks and have benefited from the wealth of knowledge that you all have. Thank you!
After much reading, I finally bought the stone today that I plan to propose with this coming December. Here are the stats:
Princess .702 cts
4.92x4.84
Cut - AGS Ideal 0
Color - AGS 0 (D)
Clarity - AGS 3 (VS1)
Table - 63.1%
Total Depth - 73.7%
Crown height: 13.2%
Crown angle: 37.2
Pavilion height: 58.6%
Pavilion Angle: 39.7
Girdle: 1.6-2.7%
Polish: Ideal
Sym: Ideal
$3400 out the door.
I would very much appreciate all of your opinons on this stone, as I have a few days left to decide if I want to keep it.
Do you think that I should get ASET and ideal scope images done on this stone?
Does anyone know why the AGS cert would say that "AGSL 8814101" AND "AGSL 8589101" have been inscribed on the diamond?
Is the girdle too thin?
Here are the best pics I could take:
After much reading, I finally bought the stone today that I plan to propose with this coming December. Here are the stats:
Princess .702 cts
4.92x4.84
Cut - AGS Ideal 0
Color - AGS 0 (D)
Clarity - AGS 3 (VS1)
Table - 63.1%
Total Depth - 73.7%
Crown height: 13.2%
Crown angle: 37.2
Pavilion height: 58.6%
Pavilion Angle: 39.7
Girdle: 1.6-2.7%
Polish: Ideal
Sym: Ideal
$3400 out the door.
I would very much appreciate all of your opinons on this stone, as I have a few days left to decide if I want to keep it.
Do you think that I should get ASET and ideal scope images done on this stone?
Does anyone know why the AGS cert would say that "AGSL 8814101" AND "AGSL 8589101" have been inscribed on the diamond?
Is the girdle too thin?
Here are the best pics I could take: