Hi everyone. Thank you all in advance for your help.
I was hoping to get some guidance on carat size and how large the diamond is perveived to be. Obviously a 1.0ct stone will look smaller than a 1.5ct stone, but at what point does paying for the extra weight become a waste? For example, I am looking at two stones:
1.12ct (6.69mm x 6.73mm x 4.05mm) 60.4% Depth 59% Table
1.20ct (6.80mm x 6.85mm x 4.23mm) 62.4% Depth 56% Table
Both stones are the same color and clarity ( H, SI1 "eye clean") and both score an HCA value of 1.9, but the larger stone is almost $1000 more. Is it worth it to get the larger stone, or will they look pretty much the same size once set.
Thanks again.
I was hoping to get some guidance on carat size and how large the diamond is perveived to be. Obviously a 1.0ct stone will look smaller than a 1.5ct stone, but at what point does paying for the extra weight become a waste? For example, I am looking at two stones:
1.12ct (6.69mm x 6.73mm x 4.05mm) 60.4% Depth 59% Table
1.20ct (6.80mm x 6.85mm x 4.23mm) 62.4% Depth 56% Table
Both stones are the same color and clarity ( H, SI1 "eye clean") and both score an HCA value of 1.9, but the larger stone is almost $1000 more. Is it worth it to get the larger stone, or will they look pretty much the same size once set.
Thanks again.