Oval evaluation

[ste232]

Can you guys give me an evaluation on this oval?


1.25
f
vs2
8.79 x 6.27 x 3.77
thin to medium faceted
ex vg polish symmetry
no fluoro
depth 60.4
table 57.3
pav angle 40.9
crown angle 33.0
girdle 1.6%


All your help is greatly appreciated.


steven

 

[oldminer]

It would appear the stone will be in the asking price range of %5500 to $6500 on Pricescope. Sounds like a nice stone by the measurements.

 

[ste232]

An updated link to the stone with brilliantscope and lightscope.


http://www.goodoldgold.com/oval_1_25ct_f_vs2.htm

steven

 

[valeria101]

----------------
On 6/3/2004 10:04:45 AM ste232 wrote:

An updated link to the stone with brilliantscope and lightscope.


----------------

Talk of "overwhelming evidence" ...

At least in my opinion, those tools are great to rank your stone against what the cut can deliver at it's best, without your having to actually meet dozens of diamonds in person and compare. The Bscope uses a scale built for ovals only, the GemAdviser uses a general scale for all - so it is interesting to see wher this one ranks against it's own kind and the most brilliant shapes aout there

The Ideal Scope shows lots of "pinfire" throughtout and a not very pronounced bow-tie. Nothing bad there. Probably more overall brilliance is achievable among ovals, but not that much more (this is what the Bscope scale says, actually).

I wander how does Jonathan select these stones

, ovals are not exactly cut for brilliance every day

 

[Rank Amateur]

No bow tie?

Does the cutter do this on purpose or are the pavillions sitting a bit catty-whompus?