shape
carat
color
clarity

Opinions Please I really need your help guys!!!! PLS

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

btrflygrl23

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
812
Ok, I''m pretty sure it''s down to these 2 and I need to know which one may be better based on ideal scope, aset etc.. I know literally nothing about this stuff. I am ok with the color on both #1 is G and #2 is H (which I was told would face up as a G by WF) I''m not color sensitive so I should be fine. I am leaning toward the bigger stone to obviously get a bigger look. I would be putting the stone into a 18k WG eternity setting also from WF.

Let me know what you guys think and thanks for the help so far!

Report: AGS
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 1.273
. Depth %: 73.3
. Table %: 69.1
. Crown Angle: 42.6
. Crown %: 13.1
. Pavilion Angle: 39.9
. Pavilion %: 59.1
. Girdle: Thin to Medium
. Measurements: 5.86-5.82X4.38
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible


Report: AGS
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 1.540
. Depth %: 73.4
. Table %: 70.6
. Crown Angle: 40.8
. Crown %: 11.4
. Pavilion Angle: 39.9
. Pavilion %: 59.5
. Girdle: Thin
. Measurements: 6.39-6.25X4.59
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible

I''ll have to put the other images in another thread I tried to do it all at once and it won''t let me so...
 
Date: 2/1/2007 12:10:26 PM
Author:btrflygrl23

I''ll have to put the other images in another thread I tried to do it all at once and it won''t let me so...
you don''t have to put them in another thread

just hit ''reply'' above the post. when the reply box opens up, hit ''attach file'' (you should have saved the pics that you want to post to your computer)
 
How about the cost associated with each Diamond... That will be helpful too...
 
The 1.27 is $9360.0
The 1.54 is $10885

Thanks

Thanks Belle but our hospital firewall is pretty hard to get around at least for me
 

The ASET and IS images on the 1.54 are UNREAL

30.gif
- easily the superior stone, in my opinion. And larger to boot.

 
Thanks a bunch belle sorry I'm a real newbie and obviosly not learning fast enough but I'm trying thanks for your help!!!!


Thanks IlikeBond very sweet of you to try and upload the images!
 
I tried loading the IS and ASET images of both stones too, and have been encountering a strange error. I normally don''t have trouble loading images. Maybe something''s going on with the website?
33.gif


Can anyone else attach an image on this thread?
 
1.27

AST_AGS-7608403.jpg
 
1.54

AST_AGS-7408704.jpg
 
If I am to have learned anything from John Q. on princess, either of these would be beautiful. My "symmetrical self" likes the 1.27 a bit more, but that''s just me.
 
The 1.27 shows more leakage in the IS image, and to my eye, the 1.54 IS image looks more symmetrical.
 
Date: 2/1/2007 2:06:47 PM
Author: Ellen

Date: 2/1/2007 1:46:13 PM
Author: ILikeBond
The 1.27 shows more leakage in the IS image, and to my eye, the 1.54 IS image looks more symmetrical.
This is why having an eyewitness to a crime isn''t always a plus.
9.gif


The leakage in the 1.27 will add contrast, I don''t believe it''s too much. This thread may help illustrate my point.

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/john-q-follow-up-question-on-princess-aset.56914/
Yup, understood. I think we can both agree both are very nice diamonds.
5.gif
 
Agreed.
2.gif
 
my symmetrical eye loved the 1.27 too ellen but i think the 1.54 looks tilted, so it''s hard to say how symmetrical it might look if it were captured straight on.

the bottom line is, either of these would be stunning. both are great cuts for sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top