Opinions on this transitional cut in art deco setting

[tippydog]

I am in love with this ring, but know little about the old cuts and wanted some opinions please. I was looking for a reasonably priced OMC and found this instead. Setting is rose gold, seller lists color as Q and clarity as si1. It is 0.57 carats. I definetly want a warm stone and love the color. Just not sure how the sparkle will compare to an OMC. Price is 925. Thanks!!

 

[headlight]

Really pretty ring! Does the price include the band, as well?

 

[Karl_K]

art deco STYLE setting
It is not old.

 

[Karl_K]

Have you seen it in person and is there a grading report?
I see some easily visible inclusions in the picture.

 

[ForteKitty]

It looks like a modern brilliant stone with I1-2 inclusions. Price is kind of high.

 

[tippydog]

Really pretty ring! Does the price include the band, as well?

No, the band is extra. It is a pretty ring!

 

[tippydog]

art deco STYLE setting
It is not old.

I have not seen it in person, nor have I seen a grading report. I am attaching a few more photos. I am definitely looking for an antique ring, not one that looks antique! So I really do appreciate the feedback.

 

[tippydog]

It looks like a modern brilliant stone with I1-2 inclusions. Price is kind of high.

I absolutely do not want a modern round stone....

 

[tippydog]

I should say the discoloration on band is a reflection, seller stated there is no discoloration but some patina on inside of band.

 

[ForteKitty]

I absolutely do not want a modern round stone....

No culet, long skinny pavilion facets, table approx. 57%. It's a round brilliant.

 

[Roselina]

I assume, that the setting is antique style, but not antique. As for the stone I honestly can‘t tell from the pictures. Maybe keep looking...

 

[Karl_K]

yea its a recent repro, and the stone looks modern also.

 

[tippydog]

Thank you all so much. I really appreciate the help. I will keep looking!