Dear All
I recently purchased a new stone certified by EGL (Los Angeles). Here's the stats -
Round Brilliant
1ct, G, SI3
Depth: 61.9%
Table: 58%
Crown: 14.6%
Pavilion: 43%
Polish: Good to Very Good
Symmetry: Good to Very Good
Florescence: None
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick Polished
Est Retail Replacement Value: $7,760
In terms of brillance, the diamond looks bright. However, it also looks milky. I wonder if this is "normal". Since the diamond has no florescence, I'd have to conclude that the milkiness is due to the SI3 grading.
Is this a correct assessment? What other information might any of you need? Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks.
I recently purchased a new stone certified by EGL (Los Angeles). Here's the stats -
Round Brilliant
1ct, G, SI3
Depth: 61.9%
Table: 58%
Crown: 14.6%
Pavilion: 43%
Polish: Good to Very Good
Symmetry: Good to Very Good
Florescence: None
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick Polished
Est Retail Replacement Value: $7,760
In terms of brillance, the diamond looks bright. However, it also looks milky. I wonder if this is "normal". Since the diamond has no florescence, I'd have to conclude that the milkiness is due to the SI3 grading.
Is this a correct assessment? What other information might any of you need? Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks.
300x240.png)