Opinions on this diamond...

[gwg_1313]

I''m very seriously considering purchasing this diamond. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated (Especially on the dimensions)! Any thoughts on Color... is the F worthwhile?

Ct. Weight: 1.00
Cut: Very Good
Color: F
Clarity: VS2
Depth %: 63.4%
Table %: 73%
Girdle: Thin to slightly thick
Symmetry: Good
Polish: Very good
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Measurements: 5.87x5.58x3.54 mm

Length/width ratio: 1.05

Thanks!

Gary

 

[Rhino]

shape? If princess the numbers don't look good.

 

[gwg_1313]

Ahhh.. sorry, I Forgot that detail. It is Princess. Why would you say that they numbers look bad? They stack up pretty well to the charts for cut I've seen referenced in this forum...

Gary

 

[Rhino]

Princess cuts with tables that much larger than their total depth, in my experience (and I've analyzed hundreds of them) = a recipe for disaster. Of course your spread is going to be very good, the stone will surely look bigger than what it weighs so that is a positive however when the table is that much larger the stone will generally have too shallow of a crown (I'm willing to bet it is less than 8%. Couple that with the wrong pavilion and you will have a lifeless stone. If you study any of the princess cuts on our site and view their optical analysis you will not see one stone with that table/total depth%.

My .02c

Rhino

 

[gwg_1313]

Carat weight: 1.02
Cut: Very Good
Color: G
Clarity: VS2
Depth %: 68.9%
Table %: 66%
Symmetry: Good
Polish: Very good
Girdle: Thin to thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Measurements: 5.71x5.59x3.85 mm
Length/width ratio: 1.02
SHAPE: PRINCESS

Proportions like this will usually produce a more brilliant stone?

 

[urbasic]

-Boink-

What numbers would need to change to make this diamond great. I am curious too..