Blue-Seeker
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Messages
- 158
Hi,
Please help shed some light on an estate stone I saw in a local store.
I posted about this stone in an earlier thread. I went back to look at this diamond again today, and I am completely mystified about what this stone's cut or origin could be. There are several very strange things about this square stone.
The details:
It is an estate stone that came out of an Art Deco era mounting. The mounting was beyond repair, and contained no other stones, according to the store owner.
The stone is 90 points, E color, VS2 clarity. No lab grading report; store-graded.
It is almost a perfect square.
It has a culet.
The stone's corners are not faceted on the table or the pavilion. The corner facets look like the stone labeled "old single cut" in this diagram I found on wikipedia. There are three step facets on the table and two step facets on the pavilion on each of the four sides of the stone.
It has the look of a square emerald or an asscher. But it only has 30 facets, to my counting: One table facet, four corner facets on the table, 12 step facets on the table, four corner facets on the pavilion, 8 step facets on the pavilion, one culet facet.
The corners are hidden beneath princess-style prongs. From what I can see, the corners are square, or have only a very small angle to them.
The stone is very bright in the center, with no dark or dead areas. It does have lots of colored flash, and bars of color, prism-like bars of color.
The stone's symmetry and polish are amazing. It looks like it was cut with a lot of skill and precision.
I can see the reflection of the culet in the stone at certain angles when the stone is moved under the microscope.
Why was the stone cut this way? Any ideas? Could this be an older table-cut or old single cut stone that was re-cut into a square emerald?
The owner wants $5775 for the stone alone. This price seems really high.
I could not get any decent photos with my cell phone camera. The owner may have some photos of this stone set in its current setting; he will check.
Please help shed some light on an estate stone I saw in a local store.
I posted about this stone in an earlier thread. I went back to look at this diamond again today, and I am completely mystified about what this stone's cut or origin could be. There are several very strange things about this square stone.
The details:
It is an estate stone that came out of an Art Deco era mounting. The mounting was beyond repair, and contained no other stones, according to the store owner.
The stone is 90 points, E color, VS2 clarity. No lab grading report; store-graded.
It is almost a perfect square.
It has a culet.
The stone's corners are not faceted on the table or the pavilion. The corner facets look like the stone labeled "old single cut" in this diagram I found on wikipedia. There are three step facets on the table and two step facets on the pavilion on each of the four sides of the stone.
It has the look of a square emerald or an asscher. But it only has 30 facets, to my counting: One table facet, four corner facets on the table, 12 step facets on the table, four corner facets on the pavilion, 8 step facets on the pavilion, one culet facet.
The corners are hidden beneath princess-style prongs. From what I can see, the corners are square, or have only a very small angle to them.
The stone is very bright in the center, with no dark or dead areas. It does have lots of colored flash, and bars of color, prism-like bars of color.
The stone's symmetry and polish are amazing. It looks like it was cut with a lot of skill and precision.
I can see the reflection of the culet in the stone at certain angles when the stone is moved under the microscope.
Why was the stone cut this way? Any ideas? Could this be an older table-cut or old single cut stone that was re-cut into a square emerald?
The owner wants $5775 for the stone alone. This price seems really high.
I could not get any decent photos with my cell phone camera. The owner may have some photos of this stone set in its current setting; he will check.