Opinion needed ASAP please

[princesshunter]

Can someone please give me an opinion on the IdealScope image (Diamcalc generated from the stone itself) for these two stones? They will be used as earrings. Both are I in color (bordering H), .81 ct, SI1 and SI2 in clarity. Both AGS 0 ideal, with ideal light return as indicated on the AGS reports.

Thanks - I hope to purchase these tomorrow...

 

[:)]

is the one on the right painted?

 

[Shay37]

Date: 12/19/2006 8:06:41 PM
Author:
is the one on the right painted?

If I were guessing, I would say "yes." It also has shorter lgf''s than the one on the left. Juicy fat arrows yum.

shay

 

[:)]

Date: 12/19/2006 8:22:38 PM
Author: Shay37

Date: 12/19/2006 8:06:41 PM
Author:
is the one on the right painted?

If I were guessing, I would say ''yes.'' It also has shorter lgf''s than the one on the left. Juicy fat arrows yum.

shay

haha, I saw that too!

 

[princesshunter]

Any other opinions? Are these considered good IdealScope images?

- Mark

 

[Shay37]

I like them.

shay

 

[princesshunter]

Is the one on the right painted? If it got good DiamCalc scores for light return (all .97+ VGs) and AGS 0 for light performance, is it anything to worry about?

- Mark

 

[Shay37]

Nope, I prefer them, as do a lot of other people.

shay

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I could tell more if you''d post the measurements. You want the table size and total diameter to be very close to the same.

 

[princesshunter]

Here are the measurements. These will be earrings:

Diamond 1
5.93 x 5.98 x 3.70
Table 55.3%
Crown Angle 34.6
Pavilion Angle 40.8

GemAdvisor:
Light Return Mono 1.00 [Very Good]
Light Return Stereo 0.99 [Very Good]
Dark Zone Mono 0.99 [Very Good]
Fish Eye 1.00 [Very Good]
HCA 1.4

Diamond 2
5.94 x 6.01 x 3.68
Table 56.8%
Crown Angle 35.0
Pavilion Angle 40.7

GemAdvisor:
Light Return Mono 0.99 [Very Good]
Light Return Stereo 0.98 [Very Good]
Dark Zone Mono 0.95 [Very Good]
Fish Eye 1.00 [Very Good]
HCA 1.4

Thanks!

- Mark