shape
carat
color
clarity

ok one more poll , before i contact wf

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
setting one in platnium http://www.whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Solitaire/-Legato--Sleek-Line-Diamond-Solitaire_1118.htm which is in my budget

-----OR------
setting two in wg http://www.whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Diamond-Settings/-Sleek-Line-Pave--Diamond-Engagement-Ring_1184.htm which is in my budget also... my ps friends please dont get mad with the repeat questions.. i''m just a nervous wreck...just couple more oppinions to help me pull the trigger..

but these two are my most def picks... just wanted to take a poll with my ps family... promise one more time!!! i promise!!!
33.gif
 

PortlandKelly

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
70
I like the setting one, but that''s just because I like plain solitaire settings.
1.gif
Both are very beautiful though.
 

kcoursolle

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
10,595
They are both lovely! I''d decide based on whether you want a solitaire or sidestones more.
 

jwcjewelry

Rough_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
52
Option #2!!! It is gorgeous!!!!
 

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
thats true i love the pave its just my budget can only get me wg..which i found out that there nothing wrong with that..the solitare i can get platnium so im torn btween the two ehhehehe
 

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
you like option 2 jw? with wg?
 

atroop711

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
2,844
#2..I always love stones down the band (esp on my fat fingers)..the center stone doesn''t look lost when there are other stones nearby
 

Kaleigh

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
29,571
Gosh hard to say. If you want a plain solitaire setting, #1 is a classic. But love #2 as well. So am not much help am I. I love a plain solitaire and then stacking diamond eternity bands with it.. Such fun!!
3.gif
 

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
atroop i will be sizing it to a 9.50 so thats a very good point..
 

Diamond*Dana

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
7,335
Eek, I love both...but love #2 a wee bit more.
 

platinumrock

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
2,262
I vote #2!! I love the look with the sidestones.
 

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
kaleigh its hard huh...i wanted platnium first thats why i considered the solitare but couldnt afford platnuim with the pave..but doing my reaserch my wf consultant even told me he would go wg.. so im totally torn hehehe
 

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
i love # 2 also you guys but you guys approve on wg also?
 

pixley

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Nov 12, 2007
Messages
1,596
I LOVE #1 - Its lines are incredibly graceful and that style allows you to wear just about any wedding band you choose. You could go with a plain wedding band, or save up and get one with pave, or even an eternity band. Endless options!
 

deegee

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
1,673
I like sparkles in the band, so my vote is for number 2. Those litte aca''s in the band are small, but they sure sparkle!!!
 

atroop711

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
2,844
Date: 2/16/2009 9:01:27 PM
Author: evaldez
i love # 2 also you guys but you guys approve on wg also?


Yes I love WG
 

Deelight

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
5,543
I like option 1 - I am a plain solitaire girl I love the fact that you can stack pretty well whatever kind of band you want with them and they look good :).
 

mommy2iz

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 26, 2008
Messages
568
#2; nothing wrong with WG and love the sides
 

Skippy123

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
24,300
Date: 2/16/2009 8:46:33 PM
Author: kcoursolle
They are both lovely! I'd decide based on whether you want a solitaire or sidestones more.
Ditto, I love 2 but is there a band that would go with it?

Don't worry about asking a million questions, promise! I was the same way; it is better to feel completely comfortable! Ask away
35.gif

Love the stone!!
30.gif
 

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
would the legato solitare setting get lost if im sizing it for a 9.50 finger?... its it better with the pave sidestones?
 

Snicklefritz

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
1,552
I like number 2. A little extra sparkle never hurts! I think the design is simple enough (in a beautiful way) that you wouldn''t have too much trouble finding a band.

I understand your hesitation about wg, but from what I hear, the risks are generally minimal, and every ring is going to need some maintenance/up-keep throughout the years.
 

Rock_of_Love

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
1,274
Date: 2/16/2009 10:17:50 PM
Author: evaldez
would the legato solitare setting get lost if im sizing it for a 9.50 finger?... its it better with the pave sidestones?
Aaaah...to pave or not to pave, that is the question! I think the solitaire would be beautiful...and I don''t think it would get *lost* with the sizing. I love how pixely''s setting looks...solitaire ering with bling eternity band, diamonds all around! Plus, a solitaire really highlights the main diamond. So, if you go with that you could always get a fab wedding band.

But, I do like #2 as well. The only thing I would ask about is doing the WG vs. plat. I have heard (and seen in person) that as WG ages, it can start to look yellowish. Which some people like...I do, it can tend to look more antique. But, maybe some of the experts can verify? I think you can treat WG so it doesn''t do that??
 

Kaleigh

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
29,571
Nothing wrong with WG, so my vote is #2. Love your stone, it''s gorgeous!!!!
30.gif
 

strmrdr

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 1, 2003
Messages
23,295
Date: 2/16/2009 9:03:37 PM
Author: pixley
I LOVE #1 - Its lines are incredibly graceful and that style allows you to wear just about any wedding band you choose. You could go with a plain wedding band, or save up and get one with pave, or even an eternity band. Endless options!
ditto
 

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
ok you guys are awsome!! i just read and read about platnuim vs wg it just keeps going.. i dont hink wg is as bad as what people say it is right?..i read some threads that they had to start replating around 3 months i was like....whoa! are u serious? as for platnuim do i have to worry? well...both have pros and cons right?
 

karee888

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
1,168
Another vote for #1! :)
 

evaldez

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
104
does anyone now if wf charges to put alittle millgrain on a setting?
 

NeverEndingUpgrade

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
1,823
Date: 2/16/2009 10:40:03 PM
Author: evaldez
ok you guys are awsome!! i just read and read about platnuim vs wg it just keeps going.. i dont hink wg is as bad as what people say it is right?..i read some threads that they had to start replating around 3 months i was like....whoa! are u serious? as for platnuim do i have to worry? well...both have pros and cons right?
I have never had to replate my white gold, ever. I guess that is just my skin, I don''t know. Yes, both have pros and cons. I have a platinum wedding set. I love the look, but I have several right hand rings that are white gold that I love. It largely had to do with price for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top