I think it was a typo in his listing because that setting is off by full millimeters. I've noticed other typos in his listings, so it's quite possible that this is one as well. LaurenThePartier indicated that it's always best to get a stone that's perhaps 2 to 3 tenths of a millimeter smaller than the advertised size for the LOGR's. However, that's just ridiculous if he states it's 7x9 and it's really 9x10. The important thing though is that you love it and that you can use it for something. It's a very lovely setting. I just adore the rose gold and I think whatever you put in there will be just gorgeous. I recently received a three stone rose gold LOGR, and I think it's beautiful, and it stated it was made to fit a 7mm round and two 3 mm sides, and it fits my 6.8mm and my two 3mm stones. I still have to get the stones set, but it doesn't look like there will be a problem.Date: 11/22/2008 3:29:23 PM
Author: mochi
No upgrading done.... the diamonds look pretty good, I really didn't notice any darkened ones nor any loose stones. It's at the jewelers now and he said he'll check to make sure all the stones are secure. This is my first purchase from LOGR so I really don't have another one to compare it to. I am pleased with it except the fact that it was listed as fitting a 7x9 gem stone but when checked it's made for a 9x10, therefore my rhondolite garnet will not fit.... BUT DON'T DISPARE.... I already have another stone to take it's place!!
What really ticks me off is that LOGR's measurement for the stone for the particular setting is not quite true. I'm wondering if it's better to get the setting first than get it measured for accuracy and than get the stone???
It's been pretty chilly here in the south but probably not like where you are, no snow here.. But I've been having to put sweat shirts on my boxers to keep them warm