:)
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2006
- Messages
- 1,864
Date: 8/26/2008 4:16:39 PM
Author: Lorelei
LOL!!!Date: 8/26/2008 4:14:24 PM
Author:
Ellen is right (as always!Date: 8/26/2008 4:10:02 PM
Author: Ellen
Actually, it''s a lot more than just the flo that is affecting the price. Aside from carat weight, color, and clarity, the two stones don''t have a lot in common. The GOG stone is a H&A cut, along with being an Isee2 branded, which means it''s very tightly cut. Cut grade is Ex, not VG, and the crown and pavilion angles are much more complimentary.Date: 8/26/2008 3:53:59 PM
Author: robh505
Wow, what a difference fluorescence makes in the price.Date: 8/26/2008 3:47:59 PM
Author: mercoledi
Looks like it could be a winner. I''m not surprised it costs more, it''s a big jump in size, color and cut! This similar stone at GOG is 47,800.
You pointed out the second stone here scores a .06, but it''s not just about the numerical score, in fact, it''s more important where the x falls, which is outside of even GIA EX range.
I''m not saying all this to put down the secomd stone, but I did want to make it clear that we are not comparing apples with apples here. You get what you pay for, and you will pay for a very well cut stone.
) - although he is under such a time constraint (and outside return period) this second stone is sooo much better than the first!!![]()
![]()
