- Joined
- Feb 29, 2012
- Messages
- 12,369
To summarize a few posts, I'm taking my uncertified .75 MRB engagement ring bought in 1993 to a jeweler and am having it made into a 3 stone necklace. Here is the original diamond: 
We only have an "appraisal" from the jeweler when we bought it that says "...one round brilliant cut diamond measuring 5.85 x 5.80 x 3.50 mm and weighing .75ct. Clarity I1, color H." The gemologist who wrote that is GG, GIA
Yes, you can see clearly the inclusions (first pic, and here in 10x loupe pic):
I discovered the other day that it has fluro:

Can the experts tell from this info and these pics if this diamond would be ok as the middle stone of a 3 stone? Would it be better as an earring? (DH sorts prefers it as a necklace so he can see and appreciate it--his first major purchase).
I was wanting to do something like this:

I thought I would do .37 .75 .37 so I bought a .37 to check it out (and then waited to long to return it, so its mine now)

This diamond looks too yellow next to the .75 (makes sense now that I know the h has fluro) and I find the .37 very small. I'd like to beef it up with two diamonds of .45-.50 each. I have a daughter who is turning 18 this year, so I'm making this diamond into a small pendant for her.
To sum up the questions in order:
1) do you think or can you tell based on this info whether this diamond would make a good center stone of a 3 stone pendant?
2) will .50 .75 .50 or .45 .75 .45 look asymmetrical? Any ideas here? .75 .75 .75?
3) I suppose I can't do worse with clarity here, so do you think I can consider SI2 stones for the other two diamonds?
4) does anyone have a good idea on what to do? I'm open to suggestions. Thanks.
Despite the inclusions, I always had plenty of unsolicited comments on how pretty it was and how it caught people's eyes.
Ultimately, I am worried the new diamonds will outperform the middle stone.

We only have an "appraisal" from the jeweler when we bought it that says "...one round brilliant cut diamond measuring 5.85 x 5.80 x 3.50 mm and weighing .75ct. Clarity I1, color H." The gemologist who wrote that is GG, GIA
Yes, you can see clearly the inclusions (first pic, and here in 10x loupe pic):

I discovered the other day that it has fluro:


Can the experts tell from this info and these pics if this diamond would be ok as the middle stone of a 3 stone? Would it be better as an earring? (DH sorts prefers it as a necklace so he can see and appreciate it--his first major purchase).
I was wanting to do something like this:

I thought I would do .37 .75 .37 so I bought a .37 to check it out (and then waited to long to return it, so its mine now)

This diamond looks too yellow next to the .75 (makes sense now that I know the h has fluro) and I find the .37 very small. I'd like to beef it up with two diamonds of .45-.50 each. I have a daughter who is turning 18 this year, so I'm making this diamond into a small pendant for her.
To sum up the questions in order:
1) do you think or can you tell based on this info whether this diamond would make a good center stone of a 3 stone pendant?
2) will .50 .75 .50 or .45 .75 .45 look asymmetrical? Any ideas here? .75 .75 .75?
3) I suppose I can't do worse with clarity here, so do you think I can consider SI2 stones for the other two diamonds?
4) does anyone have a good idea on what to do? I'm open to suggestions. Thanks.
Despite the inclusions, I always had plenty of unsolicited comments on how pretty it was and how it caught people's eyes.
Ultimately, I am worried the new diamonds will outperform the middle stone.