I am trying to choose between two similar diamonds and would love a second opinion.
1) 1.06 F VS 2 XXX Cut
Depth: 62.5%
Table: 56%
Crown angle: 36 deg
Crown height: 16%
Pavilian angle: 40.8 deg
Pavilion depth: 43.0%
Star: 50%
Lower half: 80%
Girdle: Medium polished, 3,5%
Culet: None
Fluorescence: Faint
HCA: 3.6
Inclusions: http://www.gia.edu/otmm_wcs_int/vie...160B5A2F4F36F6EE0878CCED0FA82&s=1450010084358
2) 1.00 F VS 2 excellent cut, polish but very good symmetry
Depth: 61.6%
Table: 58%
Crown angle: 36 deg
Crown height: 15.5%
Pavilian angle: 40.6 deg
Pavilion depth: 42.5%
Star: 50%
Lower half: 75%
Girdle: Medium to slightly thick, faceted, 3,5%
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
HCA: 1.9
Inclusions: http://www.gia.edu/otmm_wcs_int/vie...8C971D857C97645A2584E0EC62902&s=1450008470684
1) What are your thoughts on each of the diamonds?
2) Is the HCA of the first one an issue (it is the pricier one of the two)?
1) 1.06 F VS 2 XXX Cut
Depth: 62.5%
Table: 56%
Crown angle: 36 deg
Crown height: 16%
Pavilian angle: 40.8 deg
Pavilion depth: 43.0%
Star: 50%
Lower half: 80%
Girdle: Medium polished, 3,5%
Culet: None
Fluorescence: Faint
HCA: 3.6
Inclusions: http://www.gia.edu/otmm_wcs_int/vie...160B5A2F4F36F6EE0878CCED0FA82&s=1450010084358
2) 1.00 F VS 2 excellent cut, polish but very good symmetry
Depth: 61.6%
Table: 58%
Crown angle: 36 deg
Crown height: 15.5%
Pavilian angle: 40.6 deg
Pavilion depth: 42.5%
Star: 50%
Lower half: 75%
Girdle: Medium to slightly thick, faceted, 3,5%
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
HCA: 1.9
Inclusions: http://www.gia.edu/otmm_wcs_int/vie...8C971D857C97645A2584E0EC62902&s=1450008470684
1) What are your thoughts on each of the diamonds?
2) Is the HCA of the first one an issue (it is the pricier one of the two)?