shape
carat
color
clarity

Need help narrowing down Asscher choices

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

f4t3

Rough_Rock
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
13
I am trying to narrow down which virtual diamonds I would like a vendor to bring in house to analyze and take pictures for me to see. Since I have to pay for each diamond they bring in house I was wondering if anyone could tell me which of these look the most promising or if any of them can be eliminated based on their specs alone.

Thanks so much in advance for any help you can provide!

1.51 carat
G
VS2
6.55x6.55x4.27
table 61
depth 65.2
girdle medium-slight thick
ex-ex-none

1.65 carat
G
SI1
6.63x6.59x4.53
table 60
depth 68.7
girdle thick
ex-ex-none

1.66
H
SI1
6.61x6.59x4.49
table 61
depth 68.1
girdle thick-very thick
ex-ex-none

1.79
H
SI1
6.81x6.76x4.66
table 59
depth 68.9
girdle slightly thick
ex-ex-none
 

Sponsored By:

strmrdr

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 1, 2003
Messages
23,295
skip the si1''s the vs2 looks like it would be worth calling in.
Ask the vendor if there are anymore options.
The odds of an eyeclean si1 are 2 low to mess with them in virtual stones in my opinion.
 

f4t3

Rough_Rock
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
13
Thanks for the suggestion however in case I ask and there are not other options would it be worth bring one or two SI1s for comparison sake?

I read in one of your posts that you liked GOG for asschers which is why I contacted them first however after realizing they didn't have these in house is there any reason not instead go through whiteflash which seem to offer the same diamonds for a significant discount?
 

strmrdr

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 1, 2003
Messages
23,295
GOG will price match WF on virtual stones.
both are good vendors
other than saying that... no comment

I wouldnt bother with the si1''s myself.
 

f4t3

Rough_Rock
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
13
SI1s are out I found these other ones what do you think?

1.55
G
VS2
6.34x6.34x4.43
table 62
depth 69.9
girdle thick
vg-vg-none
(symmetry polish flourescence)

1.56
G
VS1
6.43x6.42x4.37
table 60
depth 68.1
girdle thick
ex-ex-none

1.53 (this one is significantly cheaper is it because of the flourescence?)
H
VS1
6.41x6.36x4.35
table 60
depth 68.4
girdle medium-slightly thick
vg-vg-strong blue

and I'll take a look at this one from before

1.51 carat
G
VS2
6.55x6.55x4.27
table 61
depth 65.2
girdle medium-slight thick
ex-ex-none

Will the 1.51 carat actually face up bigger because of the way they cut it?

 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top