Hi,
I would really appreciate your help on understanding the following cut parameters and decide which one is a better one:
stone 1) 2.26ct
table 57.1%
deepth 61.0%
crown 34.2 (33.9-34.4)
pavil 41.9 (40.8-41.2)
culet 1.4%-2.0%
symmetry EX polish EX
HCA 1.6 (EX VG VG VG) --- HCA score is good, but why 3 VG? I saw another stone score HCA 3 with 4VGS
stone 2) 2.52ct
table 56%
depth 60.8%
crown 35.2
pavilion 40.4
girdle 0.7%-1.5%
symmetry VG polish EX
HCA 0.6 (EX EX EX VG)
Question: Which one should I chose? I was more comfortable with stone1 ''s parameters as it seems to be similar to other well cut H&A stones. But I don''t want to miss out stone 2 if it is a super performer.
So which crown & pavil comb produces better results? I remember seeing some tutorial on GOG on bad performers with <1 HCA stone, want to make sure stone 2 is not one of those.
Another questions: What is LGF and star people talking about on other posts? Are they related with the performance of the stone?
Thanks so much for your kind help.
Jin
I would really appreciate your help on understanding the following cut parameters and decide which one is a better one:
stone 1) 2.26ct
table 57.1%
deepth 61.0%
crown 34.2 (33.9-34.4)
pavil 41.9 (40.8-41.2)
culet 1.4%-2.0%
symmetry EX polish EX
HCA 1.6 (EX VG VG VG) --- HCA score is good, but why 3 VG? I saw another stone score HCA 3 with 4VGS
stone 2) 2.52ct
table 56%
depth 60.8%
crown 35.2
pavilion 40.4
girdle 0.7%-1.5%
symmetry VG polish EX
HCA 0.6 (EX EX EX VG)
Question: Which one should I chose? I was more comfortable with stone1 ''s parameters as it seems to be similar to other well cut H&A stones. But I don''t want to miss out stone 2 if it is a super performer.
So which crown & pavil comb produces better results? I remember seeing some tutorial on GOG on bad performers with <1 HCA stone, want to make sure stone 2 is not one of those.
Another questions: What is LGF and star people talking about on other posts? Are they related with the performance of the stone?
Thanks so much for your kind help.
Jin