I am looking for an emerald cut diamond to put in a setting I already own. The setting currently holds a .81 round, which I would probably use for a pendant.
I just received these ASET images and would appreciate your input. You are all so knowledgeable and I know you will be able to help me make a decision.
Thanks!
280570:
0.64
color: E
VVS1
depth %: 68.5
table %: 56
polish: very good
symmetry: very good
fluorescence: none
L/W/D: 5.90*4.09*2.8
L/W ratio: 1.44
girdle: very thick
culet: none
gemologist comment: very bright. has great light performance. beautifully eye clean and icy white in color. the chip is not a concern; it is extremely tiny and even under magnification it was difficult to see.
213902:
0.56
color: E
VVS1
depth %: 64.5
table %: 65
polish: excellent
symmetry: excellent
fluorescence: none
L/W/D: 5.49*4.16*2.68
L/W ratio: 1.32
girdle: medium-slight thick
culet: none
gemologist comment: also bright and offers nice light performance. isn't far behind 280570. little more square in shape.
I just received these ASET images and would appreciate your input. You are all so knowledgeable and I know you will be able to help me make a decision.
Thanks!
280570:
0.64
color: E
VVS1
depth %: 68.5
table %: 56
polish: very good
symmetry: very good
fluorescence: none
L/W/D: 5.90*4.09*2.8
L/W ratio: 1.44
girdle: very thick
culet: none
gemologist comment: very bright. has great light performance. beautifully eye clean and icy white in color. the chip is not a concern; it is extremely tiny and even under magnification it was difficult to see.
213902:
0.56
color: E
VVS1
depth %: 64.5
table %: 65
polish: excellent
symmetry: excellent
fluorescence: none
L/W/D: 5.49*4.16*2.68
L/W ratio: 1.32
girdle: medium-slight thick
culet: none
gemologist comment: also bright and offers nice light performance. isn't far behind 280570. little more square in shape.