So pretty! The diamonds look older than the setting, to me. It looks like some nicks to the metal in the circled areas so perhaps the original diamonds were removed at some point? And, some of the prongs are pointed, others rounded and a few look smooshed so that also makes me think the diamonds aren’t original to the setting.
![]()
Your beautiful ring reminded of a two-stone ring I had seen at Lang ... it has already sold so it's in their Archive section but unfortunately the listing does not include any information as to era ... to my eyes this kind of bypass design looks mid-century but that's just a best guess.
https://www.langantiques.com/vintage-twin-diamond-bypass-ring-gia.html
![]()
So pretty! The diamonds look older than the setting, to me. It looks like some nicks to the metal in the circled areas so perhaps the original diamonds were removed at some point? And, some of the prongs are pointed, others rounded and a few look smooshed so that also makes me think the diamonds aren’t original to the setting.
![]()
Totally agree. The diamonds look much older than the setting and are Old Mine Cuts from the 18th-19th century, but the setting appears to be classic mid-century modern! (~1950s, after WWII and art deco)...could be from anytime b/w 1940 to 1970
The diamonds were swapped in, no doubt, you can see they don't quite fit the cups (but that's ok, i think it adds to the fun history of the piece, and the OMCs are gorgeous!)
Geometric, show-stopping designs were all the rage for MCM! Think...Mad MenBaguette diamonds, what you see on the shoulders, were really popularized during the art deco movement, but became a part of a lot of mid-century designs. MCM is basically borrowing from a lot of the geometry and grandeur of art deco, but is much more streamlined and simplistic with lots of clean lines and curves, very architectural
The platinum marking is just describing the alloy used, which was 90% platinum, 10% iridium. this is a very common alloy that is used even today
Here are other MCM designs that are reminiscent
![]()
I know this is a controversial question but should I remove the OMC's and find an older setting? All opinions are greatly appreciated and valued!
I would yes.
And then find a pair of colored gems to put right back in
![]()
Totally agree. The diamonds look much older than the setting and are Old Mine Cuts from the 18th-19th century, but the setting appears to be classic mid-century modern! (~1950s, after WWII and art deco)...could be from anytime b/w 1940 to 1970
The diamonds were swapped in, no doubt, you can see they don't quite fit the cups (but that's ok, i think it adds to the fun history of the piece, and the OMCs are gorgeous!)
Geometric, show-stopping designs were all the rage for MCM! Think...Mad MenBaguette diamonds, what you see on the shoulders, were really popularized during the art deco movement, but became a part of a lot of mid-century designs. MCM is basically borrowing from a lot of the geometry and grandeur of art deco, but is much more streamlined and simplistic with lots of clean lines and curves, very architectural
The platinum marking is just describing the alloy used, which was 90% platinum, 10% iridium. this is a very common alloy that is used even today
Here are other MCM designs that are reminiscent
![]()
Does anyone know of a good retailer of edwardian to deco ring settings?
There’s also a vendor list sticky at the top of this forum.