shape
carat
color
clarity

Marquise suggestions

If it's vetted by the crew at DbL, then I would tend to say that one could certainly trust their assessment that it is an eye-clean SI2.
 
If it's vetted by the crew at DbL, then I would tend to say that one could certainly trust their assessment that it is an eye-clean SI2.

How about the 49% depth?
 
Ohhh I didn’t know David will provide one. Doesn’t hurt to ask :) I am open to other suggestions @Niel

Not sure if David can, but it never hurts to ask.
 
Ask Diamonds by Lauren for a video (and post link). Ask about eye-cleanliness (it says it is). The shallower depth gives
you an overall larger size but you don't want that to be at the cost of sparkle/brilliance. I'm sure DBL can bring in other marquise cuts
for you if you ask.

What is your budget? The DBL stone is priced pretty good because its and SI2.

Anything else I'm finding is like $1.5k+ more unless I stay at an SI2 level.
 
Video/photo approximating view as a pendant (I love your inspo :love: )
over a hand shot
I think would be helpful in determining if the depth causes performance issues you might mind - or not.
 
Ask Diamonds by Lauren for a video (and post link). Ask about eye-cleanliness (it says it is). The shallower depth gives
you an overall larger size but you don't want that to be at the cost of sparkle/brilliance. I'm sure DBL can bring in other marquise cuts
for you if you ask.

What is your budget? The DBL stone is priced pretty good because its and SI2.

Anything else I'm finding is like $1.5k+ more unless I stay at an SI2 level.

Thank you @tyty333 I could go up in budget to the one you posted if we find a really nice performer . I don’t want it to be completely flat some crown height would be nice like the one you posted.

Thank you so much!
 

Attachments

  • 601DB3D9-C0A5-4E53-837C-918769FB8F4C.png
    601DB3D9-C0A5-4E53-837C-918769FB8F4C.png
    533.7 KB · Views: 21
  • FD7BB9CE-7122-49B4-B6CC-B83A2127DCEF.png
    FD7BB9CE-7122-49B4-B6CC-B83A2127DCEF.png
    575.6 KB · Views: 20
If it's vetted by the crew at DbL, then I would tend to say that one could certainly trust their assessment that it is an eye-clean SI2.

David just let me know it sold and the website was not updated:/
 
Another @tyty333 with photos


I agree the one from Ilya is showing too much darkness through the center.

I cant tell whats going on with the new pictures you posted (this is a new stone, correct?)

The faceting pattern doesn't look symmetric so I feel like its not facing the camera all the way even though the outline of it
makes it look like it is. On second thought, I think its twisted. The focus is off (for me), you cant even see the table, etc.
 
I agree the one from Ilya is showing too much darkness through the center.

I cant tell whats going on with the new pictures you posted (this is a new stone, correct?)

The faceting pattern doesn't look symmetric so I feel like its not facing the camera all the way even though the outline of it
makes it look like it is. On second thought, I think its twisted. The focus is off (for me), you cant even see the table, etc.

Yes it was a new stone (not keen on either) I like the blue nile the best so far I wanted G or higher in the cut but I like that the girdle is not thin to very thin on the one you posted and I can see the brightness through the belly, VS is a plus as well.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top