Thanks Storm
I can understand that about the fire being more spread out. I think I was focusing on the 34.8 because I thought the crown was too low on 34 but in real life size it looks fine now. I really think the 34.8 may not be for me because of maybe more fire and less brilliance.
This thread tonight has really cleared up my mind and made me sure now that I probably do have the right stone, the photoshop from whatmeworry and your wire drawings have confirmed it. Thank you to you Storm.
I think with me it was not so much the angles, so I must have known the diamond itself looked good performance ways, it was more how the angles changed, I thought - well they do but not as much as I thought - the height of the crown and depth of the pavillion. Looking at the angle gradient difference in the photos does not bother me because I knew from Serg's work and from what Garry has taught us about the inverse crown and pavillion angles compensating for each other. That is why it was the view from the profile that everyone was thinking probably what was I on about instead of the performance of the stone.
I can understand that about the fire being more spread out. I think I was focusing on the 34.8 because I thought the crown was too low on 34 but in real life size it looks fine now. I really think the 34.8 may not be for me because of maybe more fire and less brilliance.
This thread tonight has really cleared up my mind and made me sure now that I probably do have the right stone, the photoshop from whatmeworry and your wire drawings have confirmed it. Thank you to you Storm.
I think with me it was not so much the angles, so I must have known the diamond itself looked good performance ways, it was more how the angles changed, I thought - well they do but not as much as I thought - the height of the crown and depth of the pavillion. Looking at the angle gradient difference in the photos does not bother me because I knew from Serg's work and from what Garry has taught us about the inverse crown and pavillion angles compensating for each other. That is why it was the view from the profile that everyone was thinking probably what was I on about instead of the performance of the stone.