Rebecca_Hirst
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2012
- Messages
- 6
Could you help me to choose between the following two diamonds?
The price is almost the same.
The first stone should be better, but I am "worried" about the very slight fluorescence of the first stone.
Thank you very much for your help
1
Description Natural Diamond
Shape And Cut Round Brilliant
Carat Weight 0.64 Carat
Color Grade D
Clarity Grade INTERNALLY FLAWLESS
Cut Grade Excellent
Polish Excellent
Symmetry Very Good
Measurements 5.46 – 5.53 x 3.37 mm
Table 62.5%
Crown Height – Angle 14% – 36.5°
Pavilion Depth – Angle 42.5% – 40.3°
Girdle Thickness Medium To Sl. Thick (Fac.)
Culet Pointed
Fluorescence Very Slight
2
Description Natural Diamond
Shape And Cut Round Brilliant
Carat Weight 0.64 Carat
Color Grade D
Clarity Grade INTERNALLY FLAWLESS
Cut Grade Very Good
Polish Very Good
Symmetry Very Good
Measurements 5.41 - 5.49 x 3.45 mm
Table 57.5%
Crown Height - Angle 16.5% - 38°
Pavilion Depth - Angle 43% - 40.7°
Girdle Thickness Medium (Faceted)
Culet Pointed
Fluorescence None
The price is almost the same.
The first stone should be better, but I am "worried" about the very slight fluorescence of the first stone.
Thank you very much for your help
1
Description Natural Diamond
Shape And Cut Round Brilliant
Carat Weight 0.64 Carat
Color Grade D
Clarity Grade INTERNALLY FLAWLESS
Cut Grade Excellent
Polish Excellent
Symmetry Very Good
Measurements 5.46 – 5.53 x 3.37 mm
Table 62.5%
Crown Height – Angle 14% – 36.5°
Pavilion Depth – Angle 42.5% – 40.3°
Girdle Thickness Medium To Sl. Thick (Fac.)
Culet Pointed
Fluorescence Very Slight
2
Description Natural Diamond
Shape And Cut Round Brilliant
Carat Weight 0.64 Carat
Color Grade D
Clarity Grade INTERNALLY FLAWLESS
Cut Grade Very Good
Polish Very Good
Symmetry Very Good
Measurements 5.41 - 5.49 x 3.45 mm
Table 57.5%
Crown Height - Angle 16.5% - 38°
Pavilion Depth - Angle 43% - 40.7°
Girdle Thickness Medium (Faceted)
Culet Pointed
Fluorescence None