Thanks for the advice on fluorescence. I found plenty of info on this site. I think I like stones with fluorescence.
I''ve decided I can''t afford a true 3/4 ct, so I''m looking a bit smaller. I''ve narrowed my search done to 3 particular stones, all ideal cut, and here they are:
.71ct
VVS1
F
ex polish
ex symmetry
fluorescence SB (does that mean strong or slight?)
depth 61.7
table 56
girdle md-stk
culet non
.65 ct
VS2
D
polish ex
symmetry ex
fluorescence MED
depth 61.9
table 56
girlde medsthk
culet non
.69
VS2
D
polish ex
symmetry ex
fluorescence faint
depth 60.6
table 55
girdle thin to med, faceted
culet none
The .65 stone is $350 cheaper than the other two, which are about equal in price.
Opinions?
Thanks,
Jp
I''ve decided I can''t afford a true 3/4 ct, so I''m looking a bit smaller. I''ve narrowed my search done to 3 particular stones, all ideal cut, and here they are:
.71ct
VVS1
F
ex polish
ex symmetry
fluorescence SB (does that mean strong or slight?)
depth 61.7
table 56
girdle md-stk
culet non
.65 ct
VS2
D
polish ex
symmetry ex
fluorescence MED
depth 61.9
table 56
girlde medsthk
culet non
.69
VS2
D
polish ex
symmetry ex
fluorescence faint
depth 60.6
table 55
girdle thin to med, faceted
culet none
The .65 stone is $350 cheaper than the other two, which are about equal in price.
Opinions?
Thanks,
Jp