Date: 4/11/2010 7:12:52 PM
Author: Pandora II
My wedding dress - and it was worth every penny!
Otherwise, a vintage Swee Lo dress from the 1970''s that is a copy of a 1920''s dress. It''s in gold silk and beaded and sequined all over. I paid £102 for it on eBay three years ago, but the pricetag on it was from Saks in New York and it cost $295 in 1973...
I''ve worn it to a wedding and a couple of evening events - including one where I was 5 months pregnant - and I adore it.
What a well written post! This is awesome! I am trying to think of something to write that would even come close, but really, I can''t.Date: 4/13/2010 8:44:14 PM
Author: HollyS
Designer? Please.
Here in middle America, where we don''t dress to impress ourselves (because it sure as h*ll isn''t going to impress anyone else), Macy''s is about as hoity-toity as we''re liable to get.
I once had a dress that had orginally been near $200; got it on clearance at 75% off. Every time I wore it (many, many times BTW), I got dozens of compliments on how lovely it was.
I bought a blazer 20 years ago, from a well-known line of sportwear. Cost me a weeks pay, but I wore it for a decade.
I know no one, absolutely no one, who would buy a designer dress just to say they had one. And yes, I know a lot of very wealthy people. But they don''t wear their money, eat their money, walk on their money, or spend most of it on a bag to tote around what''s left of their money. They have lovely homes, they give to charities, they tithe where they worship, they get involved in their community, they put their children through college, they invest in their business, they invest in their employees, they take great vacations, and they retire without worry.
Personally, having considerably fewer resources than the wealthy, I''d rather shore up the retirement savings, pay off the house, and redo our yard''s landscaping. I''m much more interested in spending if it benefits me in the long term.
A dress is just a dress. No matter how much it cost. Or how good one looks in it.
Date: 4/13/2010 8:44:14 PM
Author: HollyS
Designer? Please.
Here in middle America, where we don''t dress to impress ourselves (because it sure as h*ll isn''t going to impress anyone else), Macy''s is about as hoity-toity as we''re liable to get.
I once had a dress that had orginally been near $200; got it on clearance at 75% off. Every time I wore it (many, many times BTW), I got dozens of compliments on how lovely it was.
I bought a blazer 20 years ago, from a well-known line of sportwear. Cost me a weeks pay, but I wore it for a decade.
I know no one, absolutely no one, who would buy a designer dress just to say they had one. And yes, I know a lot of very wealthy people. But they don''t wear their money, eat their money, walk on their money, or spend most of it on a bag to tote around what''s left of their money. They have lovely homes, they give to charities, they tithe where they worship, they get involved in their community, they put their children through college, they invest in their business, they invest in their employees, they take great vacations, and they retire without worry.
Personally, having considerably fewer resources than the wealthy, I''d rather shore up the retirement savings, pay off the house, and redo our yard''s landscaping. I''m much more interested in spending if it benefits me in the long term.
A dress is just a dress. No matter how much it cost. Or how good one looks in it.
Date: 4/13/2010 8:44:14 PM
Author: HollyS
Designer? Please.
Here in middle America, where we don't dress to impress ourselves (because it sure as h*ll isn't going to impress anyone else), Macy's is about as hoity-toity as we're liable to get.
I once had a dress that had orginally been near $200; got it on clearance at 75% off. Every time I wore it (many, many times BTW), I got dozens of compliments on how lovely it was.
I bought a blazer 20 years ago, from a well-known line of sportwear. Cost me a weeks pay, but I wore it for a decade.
I know no one, absolutely no one, who would buy a designer dress just to say they had one. And yes, I know a lot of very wealthy people. But they don't wear their money, eat their money, walk on their money, or spend most of it on a bag to tote around what's left of their money. They have lovely homes, they give to charities, they tithe where they worship, they get involved in their community, they put their children through college, they invest in their business, they invest in their employees, they take great vacations, and they retire without worry.
Personally, having considerably fewer resources than the wealthy, I'd rather shore up the retirement savings, pay off the house, and redo our yard's landscaping. I'm much more interested in spending if it benefits me in the long term.
A dress is just a dress. No matter how much it cost. Or how good one looks in it.
Well...YEAH...I though everyone knew that.Date: 4/14/2010 9:18:21 AM
Author: elledizzy5
Good god. I didn''t realize treating myself to a designer dress or pair of jeans suddenly made me an uncharitable, irresponsible person!
No kidding. There are so many ridiculous and sweeping generalities in HollyS's post, it would be so easy to slam it out of the water, but what's the point.Date: 4/14/2010 9:18:21 AM
Author: elledizzy5
Good god. I didn't realize treating myself to a designer dress or pair of jeans suddenly made me an uncharitable, irresponsible person!
Date: 4/13/2010 8:44:14 PM
Author: HollyS
Designer? Please.
Here in middle America, where we don't dress to impress ourselves (because it sure as h*ll isn't going to impress anyone else), Macy's is about as hoity-toity as we're liable to get.
I once had a dress that had orginally been near $200; got it on clearance at 75% off. Every time I wore it (many, many times BTW), I got dozens of compliments on how lovely it was.
I bought a blazer 20 years ago, from a well-known line of sportwear. Cost me a weeks pay, but I wore it for a decade.
I know no one, absolutely no one, who would buy a designer dress just to say they had one. And yes, I know a lot of very wealthy people. But they don't wear their money, eat their money, walk on their money, or spend most of it on a bag to tote around what's left of their money. They have lovely homes, they give to charities, they tithe where they worship, they get involved in their community, they put their children through college, they invest in their business, they invest in their employees, they take great vacations, and they retire without worry.
Personally, having considerably fewer resources than the wealthy, I'd rather shore up the retirement savings, pay off the house, and redo our yard's landscaping. I'm much more interested in spending if it benefits me in the long term.
A dress is just a dress. No matter how much it cost. Or how good one looks in it.
Date: 4/14/2010 9:29:03 AM
Author: PinkAsscher678
I guess I have to ask... WHAT is it that you find appealing about a diamond forum, again?
exactamundo. Holly''s post assumes that it''s either or (save or spend). Very presumptuos. I''m not a fan of materialistic people living beyond their means any more than the next person-but don''t go making assumptions where not merited or valid. That just makes a person look bitter.Date: 4/14/2010 9:44:59 AM
Author: thing2of2
Easy, PinkAsscher-Holly gets to feel superior to all of the idiots like us who are willing to spend our hard-earned cash however we see fit! I don''t feel inferior, though-hopefully that doesn''t dampen her feelings of superiority. See, I pay cash for my clothes and bags, and I became a homeowner at age 27, so I think I''m doing just fine.
Not to mention the fact that no one on this thread ever mentioned only buying their dresses because of the designer-I''m not sure where that even came from. But I''ve stopped expecting Holly''s rants to actually make sense or be relevant-it''s easier that way.