- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,264
Hi all, lots of you said you preferred shared prong bands to channel set for reasons such as channel set being a little more dated, not liking the gaps between the stones, the channel set being harder to keep looking really clean, etc.
But then, many of you said you liked the channel set better than the prong set with my ering (because it matched better).
Since I really love the look of the shared prong and don''t love the channel set nearly as much, I think the prong set is what I''m going to go with (from WF). The pics I posted of the SP prong set was made with 2.5 pt stones. WF only uses either 2 point or 3 point, not 2.5. Since at least one person thought the shared prong band overpowered my ering, I''m guessing I should go with the 2 pointers instead of the 3.
Of course, now that almost 100% of people here said they liked shared prongs better than channel set, but then almost 100% said they liked the channel set one better with my ering, I''m TOTALLY flustered and am second-guessing everything!!
But then, many of you said you liked the channel set better than the prong set with my ering (because it matched better).
Since I really love the look of the shared prong and don''t love the channel set nearly as much, I think the prong set is what I''m going to go with (from WF). The pics I posted of the SP prong set was made with 2.5 pt stones. WF only uses either 2 point or 3 point, not 2.5. Since at least one person thought the shared prong band overpowered my ering, I''m guessing I should go with the 2 pointers instead of the 3.
Of course, now that almost 100% of people here said they liked shared prongs better than channel set, but then almost 100% said they liked the channel set one better with my ering, I''m TOTALLY flustered and am second-guessing everything!!