Is this SI2 eye-clean? Please vote

[Icywater]

I am curious on the board's opinions on this SI2? Do you think this could work by covering some of the inclusions on the side with prongs? Thanks in advance for your input!

 

[tkyasx78]

Based on those pictures, no. And the inclusions I would worry about are not prongable

 

[farrahlyn]

no don't think so. Is that table inclusion reflecting in the diamond or is that multiple inclusions in the stone?

 

[SimoneDi]

Nope

 

[Icywater]

no don't think so. Is that table inclusion reflecting in the diamond or is that multiple inclusions in the stone?

It appears to be reflected based on the GIA report.

 

[Icywater]

Thanks for all the responses! I'm going to pass on this one. Will keep looking!

 

[ac117]

Doubtful, but I also think it depends on how large the stone is.

 

[Icywater]

Doubtful, but I also think it depends on how large the stone is.

2.5 ct

 

[YoLaL]

Confirm not an eye clean diamond and some inclusions and reflecting. On the heart image the inclusions and reflection from the table inclusions. Mostly once the inclusions (white or black) in the center it will reflect on the hearts view.

 

[Lorelei]

Hi Icy,

I wouldn't offer a guess, the only way to know is to speak to the vendor with the stone in hand and also it looks like some of the inclusions are reflected around the stone rather like a hall of mirrors, especially as it's a large diamond, then only way to know is discuss it with the vendor and make your expectations crystal clear.

 

[ac117]

2.5 ct

To most viewers, on a stone that large this inclusion right under the table will definitely be visible.

 

[Rockdiamond]

So many questions....
First one- how old is the observer?
Plenty of spots that I could see when I was 25 are now invisible now that I'm 165 years old....The truth is- there's NO way to reliably tell if a stone is eye clean based on those pics. No matter how old the observer.

 

[Icywater]

So many questions....
First one- how old is the observer?
Plenty of spots that I could see when I was 25 are now invisible now that I'm 165 years old....The truth is- there's NO way to reliably tell if a stone is eye clean based on those pics. No matter how old the observer.

Late 20's, so likely to be detected

 

[Lorelei]

Late 20's, so likely to be detected

Well, that would definitely make a suitable diamond for me in that case, I can't see a thing in mine anymore. I remember when Garry warned of this years ago about the ageing eyes and mysterious vanishing diamond inclusions and how I snickered ' that'll never happen to me.'

Guess what.