Is this a good stone to buy?

[rosemushroom]

I've been studying from the forum for awhile now. Dealer showed me a 1.31 F VVS2 stone. The table percentage is kind of large, however HCA came out pretty good at 1.1. Is this a good stone?
Table:59%
Depth:60%
Crown Angle: 33
Pavilion Angle: 40.8
Star length: 45%
Cutlet: none
HCA: 1.1

 

[Dancing Fire]

GIA or AGS stone? Can you please post the lab report #?

 

[bmfang]

Hmm. Proportions are interesting. Effectively a 60/60 with the type of angles we'd say should be complementary for shallow crown and deep pavilion.

Like Dancing Fire has said, grading report please?

 

[flyingpig]

http://www.brilliantlyengaged.com/1.31-carat-f-vvs2-excellent-round-cut-diamond-gid-1125856.html

this??

Like bmfang said, it is 60/60 style, excel in light return and spread, but with reduced dispersion/fire/sparkle.
If you like this style and prefer a high clarity and color combo, it can be a good choice.

a common recommendation is something like
https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3737619.htm
or
https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3788899.htm

 

[rosemushroom]

Hmm. Proportions are interesting. Effectively a 60/60 with the type of angles we'd say should be complementary for shallow crown and deep pavilion.

Like Dancing Fire has said, grading report please?

Yes! flyingpig did a good job finding that stone. Can you please help me to take a look at the report?

 

[flyingpig]

Again, it is 60/60 style. See my response above. Or

https://www.whiteflash.com/about-diamonds/diamond-education/60-60-diamonds-1503.htm

 

[bmfang]

The plot is as one should expect from a VVS2. Nice and clean.

If you like more brilliance than fire, not too shabby. If you want a balance between brilliance and fire, something more conventional then the selections that flyingpig mentioned are the way to go. It's really personal preference when you have stones like these to choose from.