cubiczirconia
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 8
Welcome to Pricescope,Date: 8/21/2008 2:21:42 AM
Author:cubiczirconia
0.9 G VS2 very good cut
polish and symmetry VG
dimensions 6.09 x6.10 x 3.91
GIA cert., laser inscribed
In addition, it's from Caprice Canadian Diamonds from the Ekati mines in the Northwest territories
$6000 (canadian)
Thanks
where did you get 15%? We did have a number-crunching thread a while back, but I don't want to look through it.Date: 8/26/2008 4:25:11 PM
Author: cubiczirconia
Hi everyone. Thanks for your help. But if it is such a poor cut diamond, why does it have a very good cut appraisal from GIA. Doesn't very good mean that it in the top 15% of cut diamonds, and often reflects as much light as ideal cut diamond? Thanks again.
These cut grades can allow for less effective combos, in this case the crown and pavilion angles are respectively too steep and deep to drive the light return effectively through the diamond and back to your eyes. The result of this is, that the diamond could lack sparkle, leak light and show this with dark areas in the diamond.Date: 8/26/2008 4:25:11 PM
Author: cubiczirconia
Hi everyone. Thanks for your help. But if it is such a poor cut diamond, why does it have a very good cut appraisal from GIA. Doesn't very good mean that it in the top 15% of cut diamonds, and often reflects as much light as ideal cut diamond? Thanks again.
There’s some slightly fishy statistics on the report but it’s worth noting that 41.2% of the GIA stones had no cut grade at all, presumably because they weren’t round. When you exclude those, 73% of the stones are graded VG or better with 'excellent' being 26%. Curiously, 0.2% of the GIA stones were Ideal, a grade that GIA doesn’t issue. This makes me at least a little bit suspicious of the methodology although I haven't looked into it yet.Date: 8/26/2008 8:58:50 PM
Author: strmrdr
Found the numbers:
http://www.idexonline.com/portal_FullMazalUbracha.asp?id=30649
In the study, 14.8% of gia graded diamonds were EX and 26.9 were VG and 16.5% good.
So the top 15% of GIA graded diamond would be EX not VG
Date: 8/26/2008 9:13:46 PM
Author: denverappraiser
Date: 8/26/2008 8:58:50 PM
Author: strmrdr
Found the numbers:
http://www.idexonline.com/portal_FullMazalUbracha.asp?id=30649
In the study, 14.8% of gia graded diamonds were EX and 26.9 were VG and 16.5% good.
So the top 15% of GIA graded diamond would be EX not VG
There’s some slightly fishy statistics on the report but it’s worth noting that 41.2% of the GIA stones had no cut grade at all, presumably because they weren’t round. When you exclude those, 73% of the stones are graded VG or better with ''excellent'' being 26%. Curiously, 0.2% of the GIA stones were Ideal, a grade that GIA doesn’t issue. This makes me at least a little bit suspicious of the methodology although I haven''t looked into it yet.![]()
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver
Date: 8/26/2008 9:15:49 PM
Author: cubiczirconia
Great. Thanks for all your help.
I am just starting to learn about all these details that I should be looking for outside of the 4cs. I got the 15% number, from just reading the descriptions of GIA very good diamonds from websites like diamonds buying guide and brilliant earth.
So my next question is that if I just get a GIA excellent cut stone will I be safe from getting a steep deep diamond?
However, from reading previous posts, it sounds like steep deep diamonds can still make it in to a GIA excellent grade. Are steep deep diamonds common in the GIA excellent cut category?
What ranges for crown angle, pavilion angle, table% and depth should I be looking for?
Thanks again for everybody''s help, you''ve all been very helpful.