Is this a decent diamond?

[Macksimus]

2.00 ct Cushion Cut
SI-1
G

7.39m x 6.84m

69.3% debth
78% table

thanks for your help!

 

[Gypsy]

We need more information but I don''t like how big that table is compared to depth. Is there a certificate? If so... who did it? Do you have a picture of it? If its GIA was is the cert #. What are the polish and the symmetry grades on it?

 

[oldminer]

It is not a best example. That''s for sure.

It may look okay, but there are others which will look larger for the weight and have a smaller table which would allow more scintillation to occur around the crown''s perimeter. A smaller table is also said to allow more fire to be displayed.

 

[diagem]

Date: 1/17/2007 3:12:33 PM
Author:Macksimus
2.00 ct Cushion Cut
SI-1
G

7.39m x 6.84m

69.3% debth
78% table

thanks for your help!

78% table!!! Thats against all Cushion rules!!!

 

[Gypsy]

Date: 1/17/2007 6:17:30 PM
Author: DiaGem

Date: 1/17/2007 3:12:33 PM
Author:Macksimus
2.00 ct Cushion Cut
SI-1
G

7.39m x 6.84m

69.3% debth
78% table

thanks for your help!

78% table!!! Thats against all Cushion rules!!!

So. That''s a NO, right?

 

[diagem]

Date: 1/17/2007 6:21:20 PM
Author: Gypsy

Date: 1/17/2007 6:17:30 PM
Author: DiaGem

Date: 1/17/2007 3:12:33 PM
Author:Macksimus
2.00 ct Cushion Cut
SI-1
G

7.39m x 6.84m

69.3% debth
78% table

thanks for your help!

78% table!!! Thats against all Cushion rules!!!

So. That''s a NO, right?

Big NO!!! Not even with a 10 foot pole!!!!
There are much, much better options out there....

 

[diagem]

especially not a 2.00 carat. it means that the cutter didnt have the weight to end the cutting and polishing job properly.

 

[Gypsy]

I was kidding. But I think it''s interesting that the reason for that gigantic table! Thanks DiaGem!