This is the Idealscope image of a diamond I am currently evaluating. As I see it is quite symmetrical, very good in the center but some leakage on the edges.
Any comments are welcome.
Did you cut the stone Barry? it is very nice.
The little white bits are caused by very small misalignment as you suggest, however they are leakage - white can only result from leakage from behind the stone.
I don't know if this is a
SuperbCert and I didn't mention anything
about facets being mis-aligned.
The point I did try to bring across
is that the proper "angle" combination
between the upper and lower girdle
halves working in concert are
significant contributors to the diamond's
colored light and scintillation.
I'm not at all certain that those very,
very tiny bits
of white light on the girdle edge
observed under the FireScope or Ideal-Scope are "leakage".
Barry
www.superbcert.com
"When Good Isn't Good Enough"
A pro. Hmm more like a man and Nikon. The cost of my lab ( exluding the camera) is approx $40.
$10 for the Ideal-scope
$25 for the office light
$5 for the whiter lamp .
$0 for the broken jewellery dispaly plex
$0.01 for the sheet of paper below the stone.
That is really a very clever and ingenious
"photo" studio you have built.
From your picture, though, it is difficult
to see how you balance the diamond.
What does the diamond "sit" on
and how do you balance it? Is your
plexiglas clear or opaque?
Do you have any problem centering your Nikon
over the IS lens to take the picture?
Your photo is actually very good and clear.
Barry
www.superbcert.com
"When Good Isn't Good Enough"
That is really a very clever and ingenious
"photo" studio you have built.
Thanks
From your picture, though, it is difficult
to see how you balance the diamond.
What does the diamond "sit" on
and how do you balance it?
It sits on a coinical hole i teh plexiclass.
Is your
plexiglas clear or opaque? clear.
Do you have any problem centering your Nikon
over the IS lens to take the picture? I check with my eye first and then I just put it on it. The camera touches the IS and I center it with gentle hands.
Thanks for asking. If you try it you will find its easy job.
hmm
Garry says its better not to have any plex. His opinion is we should observe the reality not the distorted reality.
I say we have to have steady environment for comparable results. I have no problem to use tweesers when I do not take photos but taking photos documenting information.
Photos always lie, but I try to reduce the amount of lies by following a procedure.
The same lighting, the same settings to camera the same treatment in photoshop ( crop, cut, flatten layers and so on). Also I use the plex for practical reasons.
The reading info on those photos is another issue. If I know how I have taken the photos I can compare them and results of newer photos.
While I am waiting for my pro model to arrive( Thanks GArry), you can go to nearest Nikon dealer and buy 995 Nikon coolpix. I am sure you have that much left from this season sales.
$20 and $10 lens are exactly the same - 6X. The Pro model has an additional lens making it about 10X. It is in a sexier black casing, but we still design it to be light and portable and an inexpensive tool so that all people can have access and that jewellers can take it with them for buying.
I am considering a patenting the next generation of instrument.
An inventors work is never done.
Merry Xmas to all who celebrate it and Happy everything else to everyone else (I don't like the term 'Happy Holiday')
Garry
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.