Pig In Zen
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Messages
- 11
Actually, before AGS launched the grading-system, the fact that there were no standards just led to an over-supply of low-performing princesses.Date: 6/5/2006 6:18:13 PM
Author: researcher
No. In fact, AGS did not grade princess cuts until late 2005, so you may find a true gem in a GIA graded stone with a cetificate before then!
Yes, that''s a falsehood. If you gave me something that sounded like a myth rooted in some truth, it would be the table should be at least 5% LESS than the depth. Which isn''t too bad of a rule to go by, except that the 5% is completely arbitrary.Date: 6/6/2006 8:28:37 AM
Author: Pig In Zen
I''m a little confused. I''ve looked at this link: http://www.gemappraisers.com/oldcutgraderules.asp but through other research, I''ve heard that the table should be at least 5% higher than the depth. Doesn''t this 5% rule and the table conflict? An ideal table (62-68%) would require a depth of 57-63%.
Is this 5% differential a falsehood?
Thanks
Yes. Or close. Either is fine.Date: 6/6/2006 10:00:15 AM
Author: Pig In Zen
Is ''pointed'' and ''none'' one-in-the-same with respect to cutlet?
Thanks
PIG