PreRaphaelite
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2015
- Messages
- 3,564
Hello PS friends.
I'm new here and this is my first post. I'm sharing some photos of a ring I was given, in hopes that it will 'pass muster' with the keen eyes you have here, and in hopes you can give some advice about what to do next.
It was bought on eBay, and the seller (Mel's Antique Jewelry) described the ring as "an original antique Art Nouveau circa 1910; unmarked but handmade from 18K rose gold, set with an OMC of I color, SI3 of approximately .90 ctw with an average diameter of 5.84 mm and 3.96 mm deep; also set with a natural unblemished pearl of 5.8 mm." Having said that, Danielle Miele of Gem Gossip thought it was an OEC... and of course, I have no idea.
Background info before I ask any questions: I love the setting and the pearl and the diamond's cut (I don't enjoy modern cuts.) I am an antique-y kind of girl, I live in a old cottage, and basically I live a small life. A large modern stone would be wasted on me. I do dishes, and cook, and do laundry, and garden. That's my life. Therefore an old stone with 'issues' is a nice match for me and I'm not disappointed in this gift!
Here's my question: the stone is pretty beat-up on one side, has a bearded girdle and chips etc. I'm worried about it being damaged further, so I'm leaning toward resetting it into a pendant and replacing the empty basket with an opal or peridot or moonstone (not that they are ideal for everyday wear but that they are fairly appropriate for the Art Nouveau style and not terribly expensive). Do you all think that's a good decision? If not, can you help me decide what to do? I'm not sure the stone is even worth paying for an appraisal unless that's part of the resetting strategy, but I've been wearing the ring a lot and sometimes I worry that I'm hurting it.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts, and especially for being gentle with me, as I'm a newbie.
Katherine




I'm new here and this is my first post. I'm sharing some photos of a ring I was given, in hopes that it will 'pass muster' with the keen eyes you have here, and in hopes you can give some advice about what to do next.
It was bought on eBay, and the seller (Mel's Antique Jewelry) described the ring as "an original antique Art Nouveau circa 1910; unmarked but handmade from 18K rose gold, set with an OMC of I color, SI3 of approximately .90 ctw with an average diameter of 5.84 mm and 3.96 mm deep; also set with a natural unblemished pearl of 5.8 mm." Having said that, Danielle Miele of Gem Gossip thought it was an OEC... and of course, I have no idea.
Background info before I ask any questions: I love the setting and the pearl and the diamond's cut (I don't enjoy modern cuts.) I am an antique-y kind of girl, I live in a old cottage, and basically I live a small life. A large modern stone would be wasted on me. I do dishes, and cook, and do laundry, and garden. That's my life. Therefore an old stone with 'issues' is a nice match for me and I'm not disappointed in this gift!
Here's my question: the stone is pretty beat-up on one side, has a bearded girdle and chips etc. I'm worried about it being damaged further, so I'm leaning toward resetting it into a pendant and replacing the empty basket with an opal or peridot or moonstone (not that they are ideal for everyday wear but that they are fairly appropriate for the Art Nouveau style and not terribly expensive). Do you all think that's a good decision? If not, can you help me decide what to do? I'm not sure the stone is even worth paying for an appraisal unless that's part of the resetting strategy, but I've been wearing the ring a lot and sometimes I worry that I'm hurting it.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts, and especially for being gentle with me, as I'm a newbie.
Katherine



