Hi all!
Which of these would you pick, taking all things into consideration. It seems the 2.51 is AGS Cut 0, and very good across the HCA. The 2.86 is AGS cut 1, and excellent across the HCA. I am down to the wire, any and all opinions GREATLY APPRECIATED:
1) 2.51 H VS2 7900$/ Carat
56% Table 60.6% Depth
Thin to medium girdle
Culet None Fluor None
Crown angle 35.2, Crown height 14.9%
Pavill angle 41.0, Pavill depth 43.1 %
Excellent Symmetry Excellent Polish
2) 2.86 H VS2 8300$/ Carat
56% Table 59.5% depth
Thin, faceted girdle
Culet None Fluor none
Crown angle 33.2, Crown height 14.8%
Pavill angle 40.7, Pavill depth 42.5%
Very good symmetry Excellent Polish
Which of these do you think is the best DEAL, carat for carat, and which do you think will look the best? Which is REALLY the better cut, or am I splitting hairs here?
Thanks
Jon
Which of these would you pick, taking all things into consideration. It seems the 2.51 is AGS Cut 0, and very good across the HCA. The 2.86 is AGS cut 1, and excellent across the HCA. I am down to the wire, any and all opinions GREATLY APPRECIATED:
1) 2.51 H VS2 7900$/ Carat
56% Table 60.6% Depth
Thin to medium girdle
Culet None Fluor None
Crown angle 35.2, Crown height 14.9%
Pavill angle 41.0, Pavill depth 43.1 %
Excellent Symmetry Excellent Polish
2) 2.86 H VS2 8300$/ Carat
56% Table 59.5% depth
Thin, faceted girdle
Culet None Fluor none
Crown angle 33.2, Crown height 14.8%
Pavill angle 40.7, Pavill depth 42.5%
Very good symmetry Excellent Polish
Which of these do you think is the best DEAL, carat for carat, and which do you think will look the best? Which is REALLY the better cut, or am I splitting hairs here?
Thanks
Jon