- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 5,083
Re: I accept Saras challenge andm want to discuss that schoo
I'm so sorry! Honestly, that sounds like any evening discussion at our house, so I understand. And I suspect there are a gajillion just like it. It's so frustrating! I'm so sorry the system chewed you up.
jas said:I very much appreciate the level of conversation here. After teaching for over 10 years and having absolutely unreasonable expectations put on me and my students...because I was a "good" teacher and therefore able to handle all sorts of things....larger classes, fewer supplies, more of a "spread" of ability in a single class, and a he** of a lot of pressure to get test scores higher than any other teacher in the school (long story) as well as teaching 12 different courses in 10 years (and seven different extra curriculars, lunch duty, and more and more meetings every year)...I see a few things that I would immediately point to.
(This is going to be disjointed...I'm typing on the fly here with a sick toddler next to me)
1. Our district went from having a central office with 7 administrators to having 20 administrators (all w/ 6 figure salaries) in my 10 years. Also, each *building* had more and more administrators (associate principals, specialists of all sorts who rarely seemed to work with kids) who called for more meetings and, ironically, more time away from teaching than anything I've ever seen..
I am NOT saying that administrators are in cushy positions, and lord love the good ones. I just saw too much redundancy, too much administrating from "on high" and more and more of the administrators forcing us to go to meeting after meeting with outside experts (paid handsomely, by the way) and using expensive outside programs (be they academic or otherwise) that never seemed to invigorate the system. I saw too many administrators trying to use the school as their own lab work for their advanced degrees. Most importantly, I saw too many GOOD administrators leave because they weren't heard by the throng of other administrators who never seemed to get their tushies into schools other than to run meetings. The good ones often had so many obstacles preventing them from doing their jobs well that it was almost comical. Almost.
The district became very reactive...if one school had an issue with, say, low math scores, the district would purchase very glitzy and pretty expensive programs for the whole district to use...a program that worked in Podunk, USA that *of course* would work with us. Except it never did. I always felt we were chasing after problems in one segment of our population or another, applying "solutions" to all the kids, then wondering why nothing ever worked.
2. (EDITED STUFF OUT)
We spent hundreds and thousands on PRETESTS. Three weeks a year, the kids were pulled out of classes to take practice tests to see how they would do on the standardized tests used for NCLB. Then we purchased more computer programs/cutesy prepackaged lesson plans to address whatever areas of the test showed student deficiencies. I could really have taught the kids much more effective and less expensive lessons if given a voice in the matter.
3. I recall from my education classes spending a lot of time talking about time on task -- how many minutes were spent on instruction every day/week/year? By the time I left teaching, I remember remarking that we'd had exactly 6 weeks out of a 40ish week school year that wasn't disrupted by Special schedules, vacations, assemblies, trips, pretesting (as described above), etc. Many assemblies a year, mostly about "character..." many extended homeroom sessions to "bond" with students and play...I'm not joking....Monopoly or other games. We started to focus on self-esteem but never seem to tie it to academics. We had THREE occasions a year where it was "faculty-student" basketball or soccer or volleyball games for which we cancelled two class periods at the end of the day. We had TWO "talent shows" for which we cancelled four classes. Back in the stone age when I was a student, I had talent shows and student-teacher whatever-ball games, but they were always after school.
I'm NOT saying that schools should be ONLY academics. I believe in advisory programs and talent shows and music. I saw our arts programs get minimalized and pushed outside the school day. I saw our music teacher fight constantly to get teachers to let kids out of class to take their lessons (and the other teachers didn't want kids to miss a film being shown in class, for heaven's sake). I saw student after student THRIVE due to special relationships with teachers that surpassed academics...but somehow we never seemed to make it all work at the same time. And add to this the kids who are pulled out of school more and more for other reasons...(Do you really need to leave school a week early to go on your winter vacation???) and problems arise that we try to solve by pouring good money after bad.
I am saying that I'm guessing we're asking teachers to cover the same (if not more) academic material in a year with more students, fewer resources, less consistency in school day, and more kids pulled out of class/school. It's tricky. I have to believe somehow there is a financial drain there as well. I'm too emotional about this to figure it out.
It's hard to stand up and say, "Hi. That new flashy program the school bought to help kids learn xyz is a waste of money," because xyz sounds so good and academically sound,even though it doesn't really do much in the bigger picture of the academic year.
It's hard to stand up and say, "Hi. That flashy new administrator brought in to support this academic program is a waste of money," because don't we want more and more experts to help our kids?
It's hard to stand up and say, as I did, "Hi! Thanks for asking me to be in these meetings about textbooks for the last year. I've reviewed the material. We do not need to spend a million dollars (no hyperbole) on this. Here's my suggestion for something better that costs a fraction of that." It was much harder to have that recommendation (that was backed by every single teacher in my subject in the district) ignored. We spent, as a district, $1M on books that largely went unused. But boy, were they pretty.
I'm not really helping here; I'm not really sure what's going to fix things.
I just know I cried a lot my last year because I was overworked, overmeetings, over classloaded, under funded, misunderstood. I had been hired for my expertise and ability. By the end of my run, the only voices trusted in my classroom were the voices of administrators and providers-of-programs. I also know that, if we are indeed judging by test scores, students in my school were doing worse than when I started, but we were spending a lot more money on them.
I left because it stopped being about learning and started being about containing and about chasing after problems with band-aids and about flash.
And because I couldn't do it. I had tenure, I had a great salary. I couldn't do it.
I'm so sorry! Honestly, that sounds like any evening discussion at our house, so I understand. And I suspect there are a gajillion just like it. It's so frustrating! I'm so sorry the system chewed you up.
