pregcurious
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2009
- Messages
- 6,725
pregcurious|1362684002|3399259 said:Thanks, Rosebloom. I hadn't contacted them yet. I am really amazed by the color of the reds they have online. I'm used to untreated red diamonds having a burgundy hue that I dislike.
The yellows they have are very highly saturated, probably more so than I would want. It's interesting.
kenny|1362692955|3399382 said:Wow, how tacky.
Nowhere on this page did they bother mentioning those multi-million dollar FCDs are natural in material and color origin, and their product is not.
It's as if they are saying you get all the imagined glamor and prestige of fully natural colored diamonds, but for less.
There's nothing wrong with man-made material, or mined material with color altered by humans, but they are not fully natural.
The market has determined that fully natural is more valuable than lab-grown diamonds or mined ones with treated color.
It's not the same thing, only cheaper ... otherwise there would be no price difference.
And yes, I clearly have a dog in this race.
I paid $36K for a 0.10 ct Fancy Red diamond, knowing full well I could have gotten a 1 ct red that's not fully natural for a fraction of the price.
I could have gotten a Swarovsky crystal even cheaper and glass even cheaper and plastic even cheaper.
I didn't want those.
I wanted a diamond that came out of the earth Red.
For that, I had to pay the price.
I don't think Jennifer Lopex is wearing anything less than the real deal so IMHO they should delete that page from their website.
(I'm also under no illuions that she'd be caught dead wearing a 0.10 ct diamond. )
Ya get what ya pay for.
LD|1362762488|3399942 said:kenny|1362692955|3399382 said:Wow, how tacky.
Nowhere on this page did they bother mentioning those multi-million dollar FCDs are natural in material and color origin, and their product is not.
It's as if they are saying you get all the imagined glamor and prestige of fully natural colored diamonds, but for less.
There's nothing wrong with man-made material, or mined material with color altered by humans, but they are not fully natural.
The market has determined that fully natural is more valuable than lab-grown diamonds or mined ones with treated color.
It's not the same thing, only cheaper ... otherwise there would be no price difference.
And yes, I clearly have a dog in this race.
I paid $36K for a 0.10 ct Fancy Red diamond, knowing full well I could have gotten a 1 ct red that's not fully natural for a fraction of the price.
I could have gotten a Swarovsky crystal even cheaper and glass even cheaper and plastic even cheaper.
I didn't want those.
I wanted a diamond that came out of the earth Red.
For that, I had to pay the price.
I don't think Jennifer Lopex is wearing anything less than the real deal so IMHO they should delete that page from their website.
(I'm also under no illuions that she'd be caught dead wearing a 0.10 ct diamond. )
Ya get what ya pay for.
Kenny you have to look at both sides of the coin here and not everybody wants the same thing as you. I would hazard a guess that most people want a diamond that they can wear in a piece of jewellery and that isn't so small that the setting dominates. That means that most natural coloured diamonds (except yellows and some pinks) become unaffordable.
If you want a red or blue or green, then HPHT in half carat, one carat etc., means you can enjoy a coloured diamond at a price that isn't beyond mere mortals. Oh and the greens get their colour in exactly the same way as the earth makes them naturally.
I have many natural and treated coloured diamonds but my red HPHT is the best I own because (a) I love it, (b) it's a wearable size and (c) the natural equivalent is well out of my price range - and most of us!
ChristineRose|1362774176|3400073 said:The HPHT diamonds are not to natural diamonds as a Honda is to a Ferrari. The treated diamonds look and function exactly like their natural counterparts. A better comparison would be a signed first edition to an otherwise identical later printing It isn't a question of quality, but of rarity. I certainly understand a preference for the rarer stuff, but it is not fair to imply that the treated are inferior. In price at least, they are vastly superior.