How does this diamond perform? idealscope/aset photos

[SpareMyWallet]

table: 57.5%
depth 61.3%
crown angle 34.7
pav angle 40.7

 

[SpareMyWallet]

ASET

 

[SpareMyWallet]

hearts

 

[SpareMyWallet]

idealscope

 

[yssie]

It will be an excellent performer

 

[SpareMyWallet]

SARIN says 14.7% crown height, AGS report says 14.8% height.

Either way, is that too low? Is the 57.5 table on the high side?


Can someone give me a detailed explanation as to how that translates to the eye? I''m still learning

 

[stone-cold11]

Looks good.

 

[yssie]

Date: 1/12/2010 7:42:05 PM
Author: SpareMyWallet
SARIN says 14.7% crown height, AGS report says 14.8% height.

Either way, is that too low? Is the 57.5 table on the high side?


Can someone give me a detailed explanation as to how that translates to the eye? I'm still learning

Crown height is a nice angle, more importantly crown/pavilion angle is a great combo. A little variation between AGS and the vendor's Sarin is fine.


Difference in crown heights is very subtle - on the L. is a stone with a crown of 35.8, on the R. crown is 33.5 (table is a couple percentage points bigger too), both stones have 40.6 pavilions. IRL the difference in rise is clear, but it's hard to take pictures of

I tried to get them at the same angle.

 

[yssie]

Difference in tables - pics from WF.


L - table 53, R - table 60.

 

[Laila619]

Will be a beautiful diamond!