How do these specs sound?

[treysar]

Unfortunately i only have Gia:

Round Brilliant
meas:6.69-6.73-4.16 mm
weight 1.14
Depth: 62.3%
Table-54%
Girdle- thin to medium
Polish: no, italian. Kidding, Good.
Symmetry:good
Clarity: SI1
Color: H
Fluorescence: Medium Blue
Commnets: additional twinning wisps not shown. Surface graining not shown.

I don't understand the comments - but i want to know if there are any potential problems to this stone, if you can tell from the little info that i have. THANKS!!

 

[oldminer]

I am going to guess it is a round stone and that the depth is about 61%, not 54%. Maybe that's tghe table percentage. I would avoid a diamond with 'none" as a girlde thickness. That would be a fairly fragile zone unless it is a very tiny region of the entire stone. I doubt that it would be as the rest is rated "thin"...

The stone could be a great light performer, but numbers don't tell you that.

 

[treysar]

Jeez, thanks - i actually messed up when i was typing and put in some of the wrong info - i just fixed it. It has GREAT LIGHT!! I notievcd that a friend has a similar size rock but hers looks more colorful, but still yellower - isn't that weird?

 

[biz_gravy]

pavilion/crown angles will make a world of difference in analyzing it's #'s. It's good that you've gotten to see it for yourself, that way you know whether or not H/SI1 is too low, as far as girdle thickness is concerned, your in the ideal range with thin-med. Does the other ring you got to compare it to have a higher color rating and look yellower?? If so, yours might be very well cut. As for the comments, i think that it means that the twinning wisps and surface graining is there but not shown on the certificate diagram. I could be wrong on that though. And only having GIA is not a bad thing, they are very reputable...the most from what i've read, but for a little extra $. Anyway, i'm no expert, but i've done a hefty load of research as i just purchased a ring for my gf, hope this helps.