- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 6,146
So I had this emerald cut spinel that I thought I knew how I wanted to set. But then I got my big pear spinel in pretty much the exact same color and abandoned thoughts of this to think of how to set that (I don't know. I THOUGHT I knew but I keep changing my mind.) UNTIL Yvonne Raley had these delightful little matching emerald cut spinels for sale. How could I resist these little mini-mes of my stone!??!?!? I couldn't. Obviously. They're almost exact matches colorwise - there is a little bit of difference but nothing anyone would notice without looking closely in multiple kinds of light.
main stone: 1.06 cts, 7.5x4.5mm
minis: .15 carats each, approx 3.5 x 2.5 (? maybe?)

(The scratches aren't on the stones, but on the lid of the thingy. Sorry they aren't all aligned, but there's enough room between the foam and the lid for the babies to wobble around.)
I would like to have them bezeled in a five-stone, ideally with emerald cut diamonds in between. But emerald cut diamonds of sufficient size are going to really raise the cost so I'll have to get quotes on that. While poking around online I found this style of ring at Lang's, which is very similar to what I want except with little rounds in between the colored stones instead of emerald cuts, so if emerald cuts are too expensive I could do this, I guess. It looks fine, anyway.

I like that it is set very low.


I made some really subpar mockups in photoshop. The proportions are all off since I didn't bother correcting to the proportions of my stones, even though I'm really concerned about the proportions of whatever goes in the middle there. Like, 5.5x3.5 is right halfway between the two sizes, but a) that's gonna be expensive for two of those, and b) is a size that is exactly halfway in between going to look best? Is it better for the diamonds to be a little smaller to give the center stone more prominence?
So, the mockups:

or with emeralds?

originally I wanted it in yellow gold but I think that only works with the emerald cuts, not with the rounds. But idk it looks so sleek with the white metal, whereas the yellow gold gives it a luxe look. BUT if I set my pear spinel in platinum, as I'm planning to, maybe I do want this in yellow gold?

Thoughts?????????
main stone: 1.06 cts, 7.5x4.5mm
minis: .15 carats each, approx 3.5 x 2.5 (? maybe?)

(The scratches aren't on the stones, but on the lid of the thingy. Sorry they aren't all aligned, but there's enough room between the foam and the lid for the babies to wobble around.)
I would like to have them bezeled in a five-stone, ideally with emerald cut diamonds in between. But emerald cut diamonds of sufficient size are going to really raise the cost so I'll have to get quotes on that. While poking around online I found this style of ring at Lang's, which is very similar to what I want except with little rounds in between the colored stones instead of emerald cuts, so if emerald cuts are too expensive I could do this, I guess. It looks fine, anyway.

I like that it is set very low.


I made some really subpar mockups in photoshop. The proportions are all off since I didn't bother correcting to the proportions of my stones, even though I'm really concerned about the proportions of whatever goes in the middle there. Like, 5.5x3.5 is right halfway between the two sizes, but a) that's gonna be expensive for two of those, and b) is a size that is exactly halfway in between going to look best? Is it better for the diamonds to be a little smaller to give the center stone more prominence?
So, the mockups:

or with emeralds?

originally I wanted it in yellow gold but I think that only works with the emerald cuts, not with the rounds. But idk it looks so sleek with the white metal, whereas the yellow gold gives it a luxe look. BUT if I set my pear spinel in platinum, as I'm planning to, maybe I do want this in yellow gold?

Thoughts?????????