Help with princess diamonds

[poordoc]

My princess wants a very nice setting, which is fine, and she knows it will limit somewhat the size of the diamond. However, I''m kinda stuck between 3 that I''ve found on thediamond.com/scheinerdiamonds.com

any help would be GREATLY appreciated
All are "signature" princess cuts (their highest)

.9/F/SI1/ 72.1 depth/73 table
1.0/G/VS2/70.2/72
1.01/H/SI1/70.1/70

I''m scared of the H, but it had the best depth/table based on what I''ve read. I''m just overwhelmed right now, any advice would be nice.

 

[JulieN]

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/why-princess-table-and-depth-data-is-useless.28534/=

 

[poordoc]

Date: 8/26/2006 8:36:50 PM
Author: JulieN
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/why-princess-table-and-depth-data-is-useless.28534/=

Thanks for the reply, however, most of that stuff is beyond me.

 

[JulieN]

Means that there''s not enough info.

 

[Regular Guy]

Date: 8/26/2006 9:20:00 PM
Author: poordoc

Date: 8/26/2006 8:36:50 PM
Author: JulieN
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/why-princess-table-and-depth-data-is-useless.28534/=

Thanks for the reply, however, most of that stuff is beyond me.

Though there may be problems with the thread JulieN points to here...

- it''s a bit dated..
- it appears to be unfinished
- it''s criticized right here for being a bit thick
- it may be more black and white than necessary...

but this latter quality, if correct enough, appeals to me, and the title especially (Why Princess Table and Depth % data is useless) seems to be responsive to so many questions raised here. Unless it''s too black and white, maybe it''s a candidate for the FAQ section.