shape
carat
color
clarity

Help with picking an Asscher Diamond

Which 1 or 2 is your favorite?

  • 1) 1.91 ct, F, VVS1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2) 1.64 ct, F, VVS2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3) 1.90 ct, G, VVS2

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • 4) 1.72 ct, G, VVS1

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • 5) 1.51 ct, G, VVS1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6) 1.60 ct, G, VVS1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7) 2.01 ct, G, VVS2

    Votes: 5 71.4%

  • Total voters
    7
I think that would be useful. The one you choose you should feel stands out for you, for whatever reason. I suppose really it should stand out for your lady but let’s hope there’s emotional symmetry between you! It’s a real advantage to buy a step cut in person.

100% agree! Here's the 3 certs for the above:
2.01, G, VS2: https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=7288138434
2.05, H, VS1: https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=1142542738
2.01, H, VS1: https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=2181113883

Debating between 1st and 3rd above.
 
I'd definitely exclude the 2nd. VG/G for polish and symmetry means you can do much better.

Do you have photos/ASETs of #1 and #3?

Just the videos from above:
  1. 2.01, VS2, G, $14600 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wc26pmsdZ5BaOwovkF2lTKovA58UCle1) - This one and the below are from IDJ. I preferred this one for its sparkle, though it appeared smaller (due to the smaller table).
  2. 2.05, VS1, H, $14500 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tIalmbvTepA9-Yb4DmiEKjhE4QxGtRoB) - Definitely the "largest" looking of the 2 carats I saw. For comparison, the solitaire ring it's in there was around a size 4.5 or 5 (iirc). I just didn't feel the middle was as alive as the other stones in this list, but still better than most that I saw. The measurement for the top is 7.39 x 7.32mm which is why it's relatively so big.
  3. 2.01, VS1, H, $13800 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_YtpLJe46hUsuMdm-GnhHcib5IbV8-N0) - This one was the only one I saw in basically natural light (right next to the window). In the video, it starts without any special lighting. Not sure if it's a bit yellow though.
 
Just the videos from above:
  1. 2.01, VS2, G, $14600 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wc26pmsdZ5BaOwovkF2lTKovA58UCle1) - This one and the below are from IDJ. I preferred this one for its sparkle, though it appeared smaller (due to the smaller table).
  2. 2.05, VS1, H, $14500 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tIalmbvTepA9-Yb4DmiEKjhE4QxGtRoB) - Definitely the "largest" looking of the 2 carats I saw. For comparison, the solitaire ring it's in there was around a size 4.5 or 5 (iirc). I just didn't feel the middle was as alive as the other stones in this list, but still better than most that I saw. The measurement for the top is 7.39 x 7.32mm which is why it's relatively so big.
  3. 2.01, VS1, H, $13800 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_YtpLJe46hUsuMdm-GnhHcib5IbV8-N0) - This one was the only one I saw in basically natural light (right next to the window). In the video, it starts without any special lighting. Not sure if it's a bit yellow though.
Hmmmm.... not the best videos but given what I saw I'd choose the first stone out of #1 and #3 (I agree that the third looks yellow, so if that's not to your liking it'll bother you). And, I was surprised that actually liked the 2nd stone quite a bit. I thought the VG/G combo would throw it off but it seemed to have quite a personality.

So no ASETs were taken?
 
Just the videos from above:
  1. 2.01, VS2, G, $14600 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wc26pmsdZ5BaOwovkF2lTKovA58UCle1) - This one and the below are from IDJ. I preferred this one for its sparkle, though it appeared smaller (due to the smaller table).
  2. 2.05, VS1, H, $14500 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tIalmbvTepA9-Yb4DmiEKjhE4QxGtRoB) - Definitely the "largest" looking of the 2 carats I saw. For comparison, the solitaire ring it's in there was around a size 4.5 or 5 (iirc). I just didn't feel the middle was as alive as the other stones in this list, but still better than most that I saw. The measurement for the top is 7.39 x 7.32mm which is why it's relatively so big.
  3. 2.01, VS1, H, $13800 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_YtpLJe46hUsuMdm-GnhHcib5IbV8-N0) - This one was the only one I saw in basically natural light (right next to the window). In the video, it starts without any special lighting. Not sure if it's a bit yellow though.

Shopping for good stepcuts is tough!

Entirely my own opinion here, and caveated with the fact that I've only had practice looking online ( :(( lol) of those...:

1. I see what you mean about being quite active - it looks to be working the 'virtual facets' pretty well in the middle :)and looks great head-on, but it looks like it might be 'windowing' quite a lot, going from the area in the centre that seems to be showing your finger through it at certain angles??

2. I like the faceting and it looks to be perfoming well in terms of light return, but I think I agree that it's quite 'quiet'. It could just be lighting, though! I'm going to disagree with @ILikeShiny because I think the VG/G can be disregarded on the basis that Stepcuts need to be assessed on beauty rather than the figures :razz: lol

3. Also looks to be performing decently well in terms of light return but, to my eyes, also seems to be a bit 'quiet', if more lively than number. It could just be lighting conditions, though.


TBH I think I like No.2 the best out of all of those! but I'd want to see it in a wide range of lights to assess fully.
 
2. I like the faceting and it looks to be perfoming well in terms of light return, but I think I agree that it's quite 'quiet'. It could just be lighting, though! I'm going to disagree with @ILikeShiny because I think the VG/G can be disregarded on the basis that Stepcuts need to be assessed on beauty rather than the figures :razz: lol

TBH I think I like No.2 the best out of all of those! but I'd want to see it in a wide range of lights to assess fully.

I thought the same thing! I expected #2 to be a dud, but it might be my favorite as well. I really want to see some GOOD, slow-moving, close-up and in focus videos as well as some ASETs........
 
I mean, don’t overthink it too much. Go with your gut.

In many ways, I’m glad I bought mine blind and first saw it mounted when it arrived at my door. No analysis paralysis.

My asscher that I bought by the numbers and with no ASET, video or even a photo!!! Ha!! Can you believe that??

https://instagram.com/p/BYvih01ArYM/

And actually that is not the best video because it looks a little dead in the middle which it isn’t and apparently I inherited my mother’s Video skills lol.
 
I’m leaning towards Team #2.
Need slow action video, with more movement from top view, tilted in all directions. Plus ASET images to confirm performance; difficult to tell if all of the center facets are lively from the angle of that video, above.
I’m not convinced, yet.
#1 is out: dreaded dead center. Way too much leakage under the table.

#3 shows too much tint to my eyes, and does not appear to be as lively as #2.
 
To be fair it's hard to compare an asscher sitting between fingers to a mounted one that has the advantage of having light all around it. That being said, I would be looking between 1 and 2. You saw them in person, go with the one that speaks to you.. there's only so much we can get from these videos. but you saw them. I think though I am going to call #1 my favorite. 2 had nice white light return, but I liked the thicker, more active steps of #1.
 
I’m a fan of 1 and would probably like 3 in better lighting without the white background. It’s an H so I think the color is not being accurately represented.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top