So I really like the look of the split shank ring settings. I'm most likely getting something custom made with aspects of different examples I've found and I wanted some input/ideas that come to mind.
Fundental starting piece- HOF Felicity.


I really like the sleek profile, and with how low the bands join in it really just seems to stay out of the way of the main stones spotlight, no detraction. And id assume less overall height gives less chance of snagging things? I also like the surprise stones in the bottom, Adds some extra again without detracting from the stone.
My modification, i want to blend it into something more like this
I would keep the split shank split a little longer like the HOF, but i like the idea of slimming down the overall band as the two shanks meet and changing over to a single diamond pave, #1 reason being that I think it looks miles better when attached to a wedding band. Just seems like a better blend to me.
So besides comments on that general idea heres what else I'm thinking about.
A.) By using a wedding band with the HOF surprise stones ill be rubbing up against diamonds (and hiding them). Seems a little wastefull. So im thinking about ditching those at the bottom and putting in a middle bar around the stone like this Daniel K and adding diamonds there.
Which brings me to a two fold question. If adding in the middle bar should i just have the bands meet there like in the Daniel K design? And also, do you think adding in that second middle bar along with the band raising higher up will take away from the stone? Im planning on a 1ct solasfera, and one of the things i really liked about that original HOF was that it still looked very good even with that .74ct diamond. I've heard that Daniel K doesnt look so great without Higher Ct. stones.
Opinions/ideas please!
Fundental starting piece- HOF Felicity.


I really like the sleek profile, and with how low the bands join in it really just seems to stay out of the way of the main stones spotlight, no detraction. And id assume less overall height gives less chance of snagging things? I also like the surprise stones in the bottom, Adds some extra again without detracting from the stone.
My modification, i want to blend it into something more like this

I would keep the split shank split a little longer like the HOF, but i like the idea of slimming down the overall band as the two shanks meet and changing over to a single diamond pave, #1 reason being that I think it looks miles better when attached to a wedding band. Just seems like a better blend to me.
So besides comments on that general idea heres what else I'm thinking about.
A.) By using a wedding band with the HOF surprise stones ill be rubbing up against diamonds (and hiding them). Seems a little wastefull. So im thinking about ditching those at the bottom and putting in a middle bar around the stone like this Daniel K and adding diamonds there.

Which brings me to a two fold question. If adding in the middle bar should i just have the bands meet there like in the Daniel K design? And also, do you think adding in that second middle bar along with the band raising higher up will take away from the stone? Im planning on a 1ct solasfera, and one of the things i really liked about that original HOF was that it still looked very good even with that .74ct diamond. I've heard that Daniel K doesnt look so great without Higher Ct. stones.
Opinions/ideas please!