Hello all,
First off, I want to say thanks to everyone who has shared their input on here. I can definitely feel a lot more confident about ability to purchase a quality diamond then I did a month ago.
I''m just trying to understand clarity chastiser a little better. I''ve read what they all are so I understand what each specifically is, I just want to make sure my stone will look good.
I assume that all diamond have some type of flaw (feather, cloud, pin, crystal, etc.) unless it''s graded flawless. From what I understand you won''t see it with just the human eye unless maybe it''s on the surface. I think if you get a higher clarity it shouldn''t make a difference.
I''m looking to get a diamond from online, but the diamonds are not in-house, and I will get charged if they bring it in to examine it and take pictures and scope images and I don''t want it (unless it doesn''t meet their standards.) I only assume that all stones will match the company''s quality standards.
Here are the 3 stones that I am looking at:
.60 G VVS2 - Feather, extra facet finish
.63 D SI1 - feather, crystal, cloud finish
.70 F SI1 - Crystal, cloud finish
I understand their is a lot more to evaluating a diamond, but I''m wondering based on just this info, which is the better choice to have brought in for pictures and scope images? (Basically which has the best chance of being the best looking?)
What make one a better choice than another? Or is there more info I need to find out first? (like location of inclusions)
Thanks for anything you can contribute.
First off, I want to say thanks to everyone who has shared their input on here. I can definitely feel a lot more confident about ability to purchase a quality diamond then I did a month ago.
I''m just trying to understand clarity chastiser a little better. I''ve read what they all are so I understand what each specifically is, I just want to make sure my stone will look good.
I assume that all diamond have some type of flaw (feather, cloud, pin, crystal, etc.) unless it''s graded flawless. From what I understand you won''t see it with just the human eye unless maybe it''s on the surface. I think if you get a higher clarity it shouldn''t make a difference.
I''m looking to get a diamond from online, but the diamonds are not in-house, and I will get charged if they bring it in to examine it and take pictures and scope images and I don''t want it (unless it doesn''t meet their standards.) I only assume that all stones will match the company''s quality standards.
Here are the 3 stones that I am looking at:
.60 G VVS2 - Feather, extra facet finish
.63 D SI1 - feather, crystal, cloud finish
.70 F SI1 - Crystal, cloud finish
I understand their is a lot more to evaluating a diamond, but I''m wondering based on just this info, which is the better choice to have brought in for pictures and scope images? (Basically which has the best chance of being the best looking?)
What make one a better choice than another? Or is there more info I need to find out first? (like location of inclusions)
Thanks for anything you can contribute.