Help reading ASET on IDJ stud stones

[greenteabiscuit]

Hello all,

Could you please help with figuring out whether these stones are good as stud earrings & will be sparkly with fire?

Thanks!

Stone #1
0.5 ct J SI2
5.12-5.15 x 3.13 mm
Table 58%
total depth 60.9% (girdle 3.5%, pavilion 43.0%, crown 14.5%)
crown angle 34.5
pavilion angle 40.8
star length 55%
lower half 80%
girdle slightly thick
culet none

View media item 122347View media item 122346

GIA 2165756292-Officelight Black-01 Copy

• greenteabiscuit
• Aug 31, 2017

View media item 122333View media item 122334View media item 122335View media item 122336View media item 122337

 

[greenteabiscuit]

Stone #2
0.51ct J SI1
5.12-5.13 x 3.18mm
Table 56%
total depth 62% (girdle 3.5%, pavilion 43%, crown 15.5%)
crown angle 35.0
pavilion angle 40.8
star length 50%
lower half 75%
girdle slightly thick
culet none



View media item 122338View media item 122339View media item 122340View media item 122341View media item 122342View media item 122343

 

[flyingpig]

I don't see any ASET. But based on the photo and numbers, although it has something going around the edges (digging or painting), I think these are beautiful for studs.

 

[greenteabiscuit]

I don't see any ASET. But based on the photo and numbers, although it has something going around the edges (digging or painting), I think these are beautiful for studs.

Thanks for letting me know!

Stone #1
0.5 ct J SI2
5.12-5.15 x 3.13 mm
Table 58%
total depth 60.9% (girdle 3.5%, pavilion 43.0%, crown 14.5%)
crown angle 34.5
pavilion angle 40.8
star length 55%
lower half 80%
girdle slightly thick
culet none

 

[greenteabiscuit]

Stone #2
0.51ct J SI1
5.12-5.13 x 3.18mm
Table 56%
total depth 62% (girdle 3.5%, pavilion 43%, crown 15.5%)
crown angle 35.0
pavilion angle 40.8
star length 50%
lower half 75%
girdle slightly thick
culet none








Thanks in advance!

 

[flyingpig]

wow.. alot of digging....
Green does not necessarily translates to less bright as you can see in the first photo and idealscope image, depending on the lighting conditions.
Having that said, I would not buy #1.
#2 is good

 

[Matthews1127]

wow.. alot of digging....
Green does not necessarily translates to less bright as you can see in the first photo and idealscope image, depending on the lighting conditions.
Having that said, I would not buy #1.
#2 is good

I like # 2 better, as well! You can do better than #1!

 

[greenteabiscuit]

I got another stone to consider. Please share your wisdom. Thanks!

Stone #3
5.09 - 5.12 x 3.16 mm
0.50 carat J VVS2
Depth 61.9 %
Table 57 %
Crown Angle 35.0°
Crown Height 15.0%
Pavilion Angle 41.0°
Pavilion Depth 43.5%
Star Length 50%
Lower Half 80%
Girdle Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted, 3.5%
Culet None

 

[greenteabiscuit]

Stone #3 scored 2.4 on hca and the arrows appear less apparent in the aset images. Should I keep looking?