After looking for the last few months for a round brilliant, I have narrowed down the choice of rings for my girlfriend. Being a newbie and a novice when it comes to diamonds, I was wondering if I could get advice on these two stones, one from James Allen and the second from USA Certed Diamonds
Stone 1
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-SI2-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1380522.asp
2.31 carats
F colour
SI2 clarity
8.51x8.55x5.22 mm
excellent cut
excellent polish
excellent symmetry
faint fluorescence
table: 56%
diameter: 61.2%
crown: 35.0
pavilion: 40.6
medium to slightly thick girdle
0.8 HCA
$26,782
Stone 2
2.40 carats
F colour
SI1 clarity
8.53x8.60x5.3 mm
excellent cuty
excellent polish
excellent sy metry
no flurescence
table: 57%
diameter: 61.9%
crown: 34.5
pavilion: 40.8
medium to slightly thick girdle
1.4 HCA
$34,800
Both stones have excellent HCA scores. I am not too picky about inclusions, as long as they are not visible at eye level. I am told that the inclusions on the 2.31 are not visible, and the 2.40 carat is totally eye clean as well. I know that the specs are better on stone 2, however, stone 1 is really much more within my budget. If the inclusions are bad on the James Allen stone, I know that they have a good return policy.
How do these two stones compare against each other, and is it worth spending 8K more for stone 2? Getting excited that one of these stones may be "the one"! Please help!!!!


Stone 1
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-SI2-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1380522.asp
2.31 carats
F colour
SI2 clarity
8.51x8.55x5.22 mm
excellent cut
excellent polish
excellent symmetry
faint fluorescence
table: 56%
diameter: 61.2%
crown: 35.0
pavilion: 40.6
medium to slightly thick girdle
0.8 HCA
$26,782
Stone 2
2.40 carats
F colour
SI1 clarity
8.53x8.60x5.3 mm
excellent cuty
excellent polish
excellent sy metry
no flurescence
table: 57%
diameter: 61.9%
crown: 34.5
pavilion: 40.8
medium to slightly thick girdle
1.4 HCA
$34,800
Both stones have excellent HCA scores. I am not too picky about inclusions, as long as they are not visible at eye level. I am told that the inclusions on the 2.31 are not visible, and the 2.40 carat is totally eye clean as well. I know that the specs are better on stone 2, however, stone 1 is really much more within my budget. If the inclusions are bad on the James Allen stone, I know that they have a good return policy.
How do these two stones compare against each other, and is it worth spending 8K more for stone 2? Getting excited that one of these stones may be "the one"! Please help!!!!

