shape
carat
color
clarity

Help me fill an empty setting with some colour!

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

Rhapsody

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
391
After 4 months and several recasts Tacori got my setting right so my diamond has moved from its temporary home in my "unengagement ring" to its permanent home.
36.gif
And while my ring in sitting on the shelf staring at me waiting for my boyfriend to actually propose I need to keep myselof busy by picking a new stone for the old setting.

I had originally been looking for an orange stone in a non-round or oval shape, which was hard to come across! There was a scissor-cut spess that I loved but decided was just too large at 8mm for me to wear. So my boyfriend has provided me with a few options.

Top left, square cut emerald
Top right, spessartite garnet
Bottom left, watermelon tourmaline
Bottom right, fire opal.

I''m definitely leaning towards the spess or the emerald, but they are both so gorgeous I cant decide.

Heres the picture of the stones propped in the head of the old setting.

4gemsonering.jpg
 

Rhapsody

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
391
Heres another shot of the ring with my diamond in it so you can get a better idea of the style of the setting. It''s a cathedral setting with 3 round diamonds channel set on either side.

Thanks for helping me choose and helping me keep my mind off my ring so I''m not too tempted to go crack open that box and look!

abpuer1.jpg
 

belle

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Messages
10,285
i think the spess looks the most balanced with that setting.
can''t wait to see it finished!
36.gif
 

Kismet

Ideal_Rock
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
2,991
I like the spess and emerald very much. The other two stones look too big for that setting.
 

portoar

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Messages
646
Love the garnet in that setting . . .
 

PrecisionGem

Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
2,030
I would go with the garnet. The opal is very soft and will be all scratched up quickly in a ring.
 

FireGoddess

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
12,145
My vote is for the spess, absolutely! The distant second would be the emerald.
1.gif
 

eks6426

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Messages
2,011
I like the shape of the emerald, but like the spess better as a stone. Do spess''s come square like the emerald?
 

Richard M.

Brilliant_Rock
Trade
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
1,104
I like the spessartite but the existing prongs may ovewhelm a stone that size when it''s set IMO. You may want to consider some modification or otherwise you''ll be seeing lots of prong and not nearly as much stone!

The emerald is a better fit for the existing head. It''s hard to tell from your images just how the ring is built but soldering in a lighter head for the spessartite probably won''t be a a big and expensive job. There are lots of options. Discuss it with your jeweler.

Richard M.
 

Rhapsody

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
391
Thanks for your advice everyone!

Richard , thank you for your comments, at first I was going to try and reuse the head to save money, but the setting charge to reuse the head was only 20 bucks cheaper than just buying a new one so it's not worth it to restrain myself. I wont be using the head thats on the ring now, I'll get a new one for which ever stone I pick.

The head thats on there is for a 4.5mm square, so the 7x5 mm emerald cuts (the opal and tourmaline) dont sit on it well, so the picture looks funny. It's hard to tell what it will look like when it's set properly.

IslandDreams, a square spess was my first choice but I haven't been able to find one. I suppose I could have one cut but I have a feeling my boyfriend wont be up for spending that much more money on this ring
3.gif


I love both the spess and the emerald, I am so indecisive! Which ever stone doesn't make the cut this time will be set sooner or later. The fire opals (and the spess actually) were bought as a matched pair, so I'm thinking earrings for those.

So the spess is clearly the front runner. The colour is so grogeous and I don't have anything else like it.
 

Richard M.

Brilliant_Rock
Trade
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
1,104
Date: 2/8/2006 7:04:25 PM
Author: Rhapsody
at first I was going to try and reuse the head to save money, but the setting charge to reuse the head was only 20 bucks cheaper than just buying a new one so it''s not worth it

I figured you''d go the ''new'' route -- it''s best in nearly every case. You don''t want to lose whatever stone you end up choosing.
 

ChooChoo

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Sep 25, 2003
Messages
513
I like the emerald better, actually - it looks like an art deco piece in that setting, and I think the square shape is perfect for it. I don''t even like emeralds usually, but it makes a beautiful match with your setting.
 

kaylagee

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Apr 7, 2003
Messages
1,213
strm, wow that tourmaline is gorgeous...

***
Rh, Of your choices, I like the spess garnet best.
 

Tacori E-ring

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
20,041
I like the garnet the best out of the four choices as well.
 

movie zombie

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
11,879
no contest: the spess.

is the tucson show still going on? i had an e-mail exchange with an attendee who was willing to shop for me re spess.....just an idea if you really want something other than oval.

movie zombie
 

gemprincess

Rough_Rock
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
12
1. square cut emerald

I do love the spessartite garnet it's stunning but the shape is wrong for that setting imo.

Sorry but those other two stones look wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top