Help me evaluate these ASET and idealscope images

[missprionic]

Stone is a .92 carat round brilliant, triple excellent, G, VS2, no fluorescence, 6.27×6.29×3.84mm
HCA tool score 1.2 – table 56%, crown 34.5%, pavilion 40.8%, depth 61.2%

Images:





Worth blind buying as an engagement ring?

 

[flyingpig]

Nice

 

[missprionic]

Thank you. Anyone else have any opinions before I pull the trigger....?

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

Grading report - and inclusion photos - looks too clean

 

[missprionic]

I mostly would love to know how these ASET and idealscope images rate from someone who knows how to better read them than myself

Grading report shows only the tiny black spot that you can see on these images at about 10 o'clock:

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

The scope images are fantastic.
What does the grading report say. It looks way too clean for a VS2. It could be hazy cloudy

 

[realazy]

As Garry says, does the grading report have any comments? I had to return a cloudy/hazy Vs2 stone because I didnt know that the comment "clarity grade is based on clouds not shown" could affect transparency so much. The stone I returned also had a remarkedly clean inclusion plot and looked super clean in magnified video.

EDIT: Since this is below 1 carat and wont have a clarity plot, is the main clarity characteristic cloud?