- Jun 30, 2008
I vote with these two.
Date: 2/18/2009 11:57:42 AM
For a more casual wedding, I would go with #1 as is, the playfulness of both typefaces compliment each other well IMO.
If you want the invites to have a more formal feel I like the script (the names) from #4 with the text from #2, or any other serifed typeface. To me the script seems out of place with a more casual sans-serif face like the ones from 1,3 & 4.
I like the more "fun" type I guess you would call it, but not too casual. I was thinking maybe #3 because it has the cursive/script type for the names, but not too formal, somewhere in the middle...and the other text is more on the fun side too. It doesn''t look too "kiddy" does it?
How does the wording sound? We''re also having the outside ceremony and the reception at the same venue, do I need to include this or am I okay? I don''t want to confuse the guests...but I''m also trying to avoid making reception cards if possible.