Ok- so I''m back to my 2 original stones (the other was a bit too expensive). They are both I1''s... and yes that means visible inclusions. But I''ve never been one to be able to find an inclusion, so I''m ok with this and really like the size of the stones. Here goes...
Stone #1- Pictures 1,2,3
1.5 ct
7.36 x 7.39 x 4.54
Round Brilliant
AGS cert cut grade 0 (triple 0)
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Table: 56.6
Depth: 61.6
Crown angle: 34.5
Pavilion angle: 40.9
HCA: 1.6
$5410
For the triple zero- I expect a bit more red. Is this just an eh picture?
Stone #2- Pictures 4,5,6
1.7 ct
7.64 x 7.69 x 4.67
Round Brilliant
GIA Cert cut grade: Very Good
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Good
Table: 59
Depth: 60.9
Crown Angle: 34.5
Pavilion angle: 40.6
HCA: 1.6
$6100
This stone has a white feather inclusion across the table- I was told it kind of looks like a facet to the untrained eye.
Stone #1- Pictures 1,2,3
1.5 ct
7.36 x 7.39 x 4.54
Round Brilliant
AGS cert cut grade 0 (triple 0)
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Table: 56.6
Depth: 61.6
Crown angle: 34.5
Pavilion angle: 40.9
HCA: 1.6
$5410
For the triple zero- I expect a bit more red. Is this just an eh picture?
Stone #2- Pictures 4,5,6
1.7 ct
7.64 x 7.69 x 4.67
Round Brilliant
GIA Cert cut grade: Very Good
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Good
Table: 59
Depth: 60.9
Crown Angle: 34.5
Pavilion angle: 40.6
HCA: 1.6
$6100
This stone has a white feather inclusion across the table- I was told it kind of looks like a facet to the untrained eye.
300x240.png)