Cosmo_Kramer
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2016
- Messages
- 9
So I talked to an adviser after I did research myself. I wanted to spend $3,000 and get the best value I could. I just put the ring on hold, but I'm not sure if I can share the exact ring.
This is the setting:
https://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/halo/14k-white-gold-pave-halo-and-shank-diamond-engagement-ring-round-center-item-17445
The diamond is SHAPE:
Round
CARAT WEIGHT: 0.70
COLOR: H
CLARITY: SI2
CUT: Excellent
POLISH: Excellent
SYMMETRY: Excellent
FLUORESCENCE: Medium
L/W/D (MM): 5.69*5.65*3.57
L/W RATIO: 1.01
DEPTH %: 62.90
GIRDLE: Medium - Slightly Thick
TABLE %: 55.00
CERTIFICATE: GIA
CROWN ∠: 34.50
CROWN %: 15.50
PAVILION ∠: 41.00
PAVILION %: 43.50
The young lady helping me said that the SI2 inclusion wasn't noticeable by the naked eye and seemed confident this was the best value for the setting that I wanted. Please be honest and tell me if you think this is hideous/cheap.
This is the setting:
https://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/halo/14k-white-gold-pave-halo-and-shank-diamond-engagement-ring-round-center-item-17445
The diamond is SHAPE:
Round
CARAT WEIGHT: 0.70
COLOR: H
CLARITY: SI2
CUT: Excellent
POLISH: Excellent
SYMMETRY: Excellent
FLUORESCENCE: Medium
L/W/D (MM): 5.69*5.65*3.57
L/W RATIO: 1.01
DEPTH %: 62.90
GIRDLE: Medium - Slightly Thick
TABLE %: 55.00
CERTIFICATE: GIA
CROWN ∠: 34.50
CROWN %: 15.50
PAVILION ∠: 41.00
PAVILION %: 43.50
The young lady helping me said that the SI2 inclusion wasn't noticeable by the naked eye and seemed confident this was the best value for the setting that I wanted. Please be honest and tell me if you think this is hideous/cheap.