Hi everyone
I have narrowed down my quest for the perfect diamond for my wedding proposal. As per below:
[A] 1.643 I VS1 1.4-EX ex-ex-ex-vg AGS0 H&A ACA US$12507 [THIS IS THE DIAMOND I RESERVED]
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1803&prc=12507
Comment: WF adviser''s recommendation is that given ACA cut, I color would show face up very white, so cost saving is compelling.
1.591 G VS2 1.5-EX ex-ex-ex-vg AGS0 H&A ACA US$15371
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1818&prc=15371
[C] 1.518 G VVS2 1.4-EX ex-ex-ex-vg AGS0 H&A ACA US$16886
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1829&prc=16886
[D] 1.516 E VS2 1-EX ex-ex-ex-vg AGS0 H&A ACA US$16731
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1828&prc=16731
Also, based on WF''s recommendation - setting chosen was Sleek Line Solitaire as this setting would prevent side viewing of the diamond so I colour for Diamond A is not an issue:
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1828&prc=16731
I''m willing to spend for a high quality ring (had a maximum budget of US$19.5k originally) but would like value for money (ie. I would not be willing to spend significantly more money for immaterial increases in performance) and since any cost savings is going to benefit both my future wife and I. My questions are:
1) Did I make the right choice in choosing A? Would A have a significantly lower performance in colour versus the other stones?
2) If A isn''t the right choice, which of the above would you choose instead (or suggest an alternative), and why?
3) Would another setting from WhiteFlash be more appropriate for this stone or other stone recommended? I wanted a simple elegant ring that showed off/emphasised the diamond and made it bigger, brighter, higher performance.
Would greatly appreciate some opinions from the experts in this forum.
Thanks in advance!
Ken
I have narrowed down my quest for the perfect diamond for my wedding proposal. As per below:
[A] 1.643 I VS1 1.4-EX ex-ex-ex-vg AGS0 H&A ACA US$12507 [THIS IS THE DIAMOND I RESERVED]
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1803&prc=12507
Comment: WF adviser''s recommendation is that given ACA cut, I color would show face up very white, so cost saving is compelling.
1.591 G VS2 1.5-EX ex-ex-ex-vg AGS0 H&A ACA US$15371
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1818&prc=15371
[C] 1.518 G VVS2 1.4-EX ex-ex-ex-vg AGS0 H&A ACA US$16886
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1829&prc=16886
[D] 1.516 E VS2 1-EX ex-ex-ex-vg AGS0 H&A ACA US$16731
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1828&prc=16731
Also, based on WF''s recommendation - setting chosen was Sleek Line Solitaire as this setting would prevent side viewing of the diamond so I colour for Diamond A is not an issue:
https://www.pricescope.com/origin.asp?sh=88&id=1828&prc=16731
I''m willing to spend for a high quality ring (had a maximum budget of US$19.5k originally) but would like value for money (ie. I would not be willing to spend significantly more money for immaterial increases in performance) and since any cost savings is going to benefit both my future wife and I. My questions are:
1) Did I make the right choice in choosing A? Would A have a significantly lower performance in colour versus the other stones?
2) If A isn''t the right choice, which of the above would you choose instead (or suggest an alternative), and why?
3) Would another setting from WhiteFlash be more appropriate for this stone or other stone recommended? I wanted a simple elegant ring that showed off/emphasised the diamond and made it bigger, brighter, higher performance.
Would greatly appreciate some opinions from the experts in this forum.
Thanks in advance!
Ken