katamari
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- May 18, 2008
- Messages
- 2,949
Hi kmci!
I certainly don''t know about the technicalities like Garry and Karl, but from I strictly aesthetic point I think this Asscher is smokin'' hot. It looks fantastic.
I have a <1 carat Asscher that I love, love, L-O-V-E! I suggest, if you are thinking about size (and haven''t already done this), visit a B&M store and hold up some stones against your hand to see what you think. In the longrun, I think you will be happiest if you go with the stone you feel suits you best than the biggest one you can afford. What size are the rings you like the most irl (on others)? What would suit your lifestyle and work best?
Really check spread because I think this is more important than carat size--no one will take your stone out of the setting and weigh it, but they will look at it. Especially as you approach the points where cost increases just because of size (1, 1.25, 1.5), you want to make sure you are getting what you pay for.
Also, consider the setting. How are you thinking about having it set? This is absolutely just my opinion (and some will disagree), but if you are thinking about sidestones or halos, you might want to go bigger because there will be more competition for the spotlight. But, a solitaire (again, in my opinion) can be smaller because there is no competition. Higher settings also make the stone look bigger than lower settings.
Good luck!
ETA: I just realized by re-reading my post that I am assuming you are the ring-getter. If you are the ring-giver, either ask her preferences (if you are openly discussing this) or take someone of a similar frame and taste to the store to try to assess what you want.

I certainly don''t know about the technicalities like Garry and Karl, but from I strictly aesthetic point I think this Asscher is smokin'' hot. It looks fantastic.
I have a <1 carat Asscher that I love, love, L-O-V-E! I suggest, if you are thinking about size (and haven''t already done this), visit a B&M store and hold up some stones against your hand to see what you think. In the longrun, I think you will be happiest if you go with the stone you feel suits you best than the biggest one you can afford. What size are the rings you like the most irl (on others)? What would suit your lifestyle and work best?
Really check spread because I think this is more important than carat size--no one will take your stone out of the setting and weigh it, but they will look at it. Especially as you approach the points where cost increases just because of size (1, 1.25, 1.5), you want to make sure you are getting what you pay for.
Also, consider the setting. How are you thinking about having it set? This is absolutely just my opinion (and some will disagree), but if you are thinking about sidestones or halos, you might want to go bigger because there will be more competition for the spotlight. But, a solitaire (again, in my opinion) can be smaller because there is no competition. Higher settings also make the stone look bigger than lower settings.
Good luck!

ETA: I just realized by re-reading my post that I am assuming you are the ring-getter. If you are the ring-giver, either ask her preferences (if you are openly discussing this) or take someone of a similar frame and taste to the store to try to assess what you want.